TAN BENG HUI CAROLYN v The Law Society of Singapore
Key facts
| Court | Court of Appeal |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Belinda Ang Saw Ean, Judith Prakash, Sundaresh Menon |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure, Courts and Jurisdiction, Legal Profession |
| Counsel | Cecilia Hendrick LLC, Tan & Au LLP, WongPartnership LLP, Au Thye Chuen, Cecilia Hendrick, Felicia Soong Wanyi, K Chandra Sekaran, Leong De Shun Kevin, Rajan Menon Smitha |
Source: [2023] SGCA 7, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (9)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Decided 22 February 2023 by the Court of Appeal (Civil Appeal No 16 of 2022), comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA (who delivered the grounds of decision), this was Tan Beng Hui Carolyn's appeal against a High Court judge's dismissal of her application under s 95 of the Legal Profession Act to review and set aside the Council of the Law Society's decision to impose a $10,000 penalty for her breaches of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015. The court dismissed the appeal on 12 September 2022. Its reasons turned mainly on a preliminary jurisdictional issue: whether the appellant ought to have brought her appeal to the Appellate Division of the High Court instead of to the Court of Appeal.
What did the Court of Appeal decide in Tan Beng Hui Carolyn v Law Society of Singapore [2023] SGCA 7?
The Court of Appeal dismissed Tan Beng Hui Carolyn's appeal on 12 September 2022. She had challenged a $10,000 penalty imposed by the Law Society Council for breaches of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015; the decision turned mainly on a preliminary jurisdictional issue.
What was the jurisdictional issue in [2023] SGCA 7?
The preliminary issue was whether Tan Beng Hui Carolyn ought to have brought her appeal to the Appellate Division of the High Court instead of the Court of Appeal. The panel comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA, who delivered the grounds.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGCA 7)