TAN BENG HUI CAROLYN v The Law Society of Singapore

[2023] SGCA 7 Court of Appeal 22 February 2023 CA/CA 16/2022
5 cases cited

Key facts

Court Court of Appeal
Decided
Judges Belinda Ang Saw Ean, Judith Prakash, Sundaresh Menon
Charges / claim Civil Procedure, Courts and Jurisdiction, Legal Profession
Counsel Cecilia Hendrick LLC, Tan & Au LLP, WongPartnership LLP, Au Thye Chuen, Cecilia Hendrick, Felicia Soong Wanyi, K Chandra Sekaran, Leong De Shun Kevin, Rajan Menon Smitha

Source: [2023] SGCA 7, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (3)

Counsel (9)

Cecilia Hendrick LLC Firm
Tan & Au LLP Firm
WongPartnership LLP Firm
Au Thye Chuen Counsel for the appellant
Cecilia Hendrick Counsel for the appellant
Felicia Soong Wanyi Counsel for the respondent
K Chandra Sekaran Counsel for the appellant
Leong De Shun Kevin Counsel for the appellant
Rajan Menon Smitha Counsel for the respondent

Parties (2)

The Law Society of Singapore Respondent
Tan Beng Hui Carolyn Appellant

Case Significance

Decided 22 February 2023 by the Court of Appeal (Civil Appeal No 16 of 2022), comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA (who delivered the grounds of decision), this was Tan Beng Hui Carolyn's appeal against a High Court judge's dismissal of her application under s 95 of the Legal Profession Act to review and set aside the Council of the Law Society's decision to impose a $10,000 penalty for her breaches of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015. The court dismissed the appeal on 12 September 2022. Its reasons turned mainly on a preliminary jurisdictional issue: whether the appellant ought to have brought her appeal to the Appellate Division of the High Court instead of to the Court of Appeal.

What did the Court of Appeal decide in Tan Beng Hui Carolyn v Law Society of Singapore [2023] SGCA 7?

The Court of Appeal dismissed Tan Beng Hui Carolyn's appeal on 12 September 2022. She had challenged a $10,000 penalty imposed by the Law Society Council for breaches of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015; the decision turned mainly on a preliminary jurisdictional issue.

What was the jurisdictional issue in [2023] SGCA 7?

The preliminary issue was whether Tan Beng Hui Carolyn ought to have brought her appeal to the Appellate Division of the High Court instead of the Court of Appeal. The panel comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA, who delivered the grounds.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (5)

SG (1)
[2022] SGCA 40
SLR (4)
[1992] 3 SLR(R) 825 [2017] 4 SLR 1369 [2021] 1 SLR 874 [2022] 1 SLR 1134

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGCA 7)