Rajan Menon Smitha
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Rajan Menon Smitha. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Rajan Menon Smitha appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the Singapore International Commercial Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Insolvency Law and Civil Procedure, and Rajan Menon Smitha acted for the applicant in 2 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- Singapore International Commercial Court, Court of Appeal
- Period
- February 2023 to July 2025
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Rajan Menon Smitha — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Rajan Menon Smitha appeared
- Counsel for the applicant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we allow the appeals of the Liquidator and the Company and set aside the orders made below.”
Court of Appeal · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 27 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Rajan Menon Smitha practice?
Counsel for the applicant (2)
-
The court allowed TFL's application in part, declaring that SUM 19 was commenced in breach of ORC 13, striking it out and dismissing it as against TFL, and ordering that no one may take a step to…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 11 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 18 -
The court refused the adjournment and granted all the relief sought: it recognised the plan and the confirmation order, allowed TFL to administer and realise its Singapore assets and take steps to…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 21 February 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 4
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeals of the liquidator and the company, set aside the orders below and expunged the admitted amounts of Inner Mongolia's proof and Shenzhen's proof.
Court of Appeal · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 27
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA) dismissed the appeal, holding that it should have been brought to the Appellate Division and was in any event…
Court of Appeal · 22 February 2023 · [2023] SGCA 7