Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano
Outcome
Appeal allowedwe allow the appeal.
Source: [2024] SGCA 53, Court of Appeal, decided 22 November 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Court of Appeal |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Belinda Ang Saw Ean, Judith Prakash, Tay Yong Kwang |
| Charges / claim | Intellectual Property |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed |
| Counsel | Bird & Bird ATMD LLP, Faculty of Law, Singapore Management University, Mirandah Law LLP, Ravindran Associates LLP, Chan Wenqiang, Gordon Ionwy David Llewelyn, Loy Ming Chuen Brendan, Sivagnanaratnam Sivananthan, Sukumar s/o Karuppiah, Yip Shuen Kai Harren |
Source: [2024] SGCA 53, Court of Appeal, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (10)
Case Significance
Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano [2024] SGCA 53 was decided by the Court of Appeal on 22 November 2024, comprising Tay Yong Kwang JCA, Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA and Judith Prakash SJ, with Judith Prakash SJ delivering the judgment of the court (judgment reserved after hearings on 5 April and 29 July 2024). Civil Appeal No 37 of 2023 arose from Tribunal Appeal No 8 of 2022, under s 32(2)(e) of the Geographical Indications Act 2014 (Act 19 of 2014) and Rule 26 of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Intellectual Property) Rules 2022, concerning a Request for a Qualification to Singapore Geographical Indication Application No. 50201900057U by Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte Ltd and the opposition by Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano.
The appeal concerned Intellectual Property law on geographical indications, specifically the qualification of rights, the burden of proof, and whether "Parmesan" is a translation of "Parmigiano Reggiano". Judith Prakash SJ noted that within Singapore's culinary culture cheese holds a significant place both as a food item and as an ingredient of staple dishes, and that under the Geographical Indications Act 2014 the protection of geographical indications safeguards relevant interests. The appellant was represented by Mirandah Law LLP and Ravindran Associates LLP, the respondent by Bird & Bird ATMD LLP, with independent counsel from the Faculty of Law, Singapore Management University including Gordon Ionwy David Llewelyn.
[2024] SGCA 53 explained
Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano ([2024] SGCA 53) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 22 November 2024. It is categorised under Intellectual Property. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGCA 53 about?
Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano ([2024] SGCA 53) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Intellectual Property — Geographical indications — Qualification of rights — Burden of proof” and “Intellectual Property — Geographical indications — Qualification of rights — Whether “Parmesan” is a translation of “Parmigiano Reggiano””, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGCA 53 consider?
The judgment refers to Sale of Food Act (Cap 283), Sale of Food Act, and Trade Marks Act (Cap 332). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What was the central question in Fonterra Brands v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano [2024] SGCA 53?
Fonterra Brands (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Consorzio del Formaggio Parmigiano Reggiano [2024] SGCA 53 concerned geographical indications under the Geographical Indications Act 2014, including the qualification of rights, the burden of proof, and whether "Parmesan" is a translation of "Parmigiano Reggiano".
Who decided the Parmesan geographical indication appeal [2024] SGCA 53?
[2024] SGCA 53 was decided by the Court of Appeal comprising Tay Yong Kwang JCA, Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA and Judith Prakash SJ, with Judith Prakash SJ delivering the judgment on 22 November 2024 in Civil Appeal No 37 of 2023.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGCA 53)