VIRGILIO TARRAGO DA SILVEIRA & Anor v HASHSTACS PTE. LTD. & Anor

[2024] SGHC(I) 32 Singapore International Commercial Court 16 December 2024 SIC/OA 7/2023 115 min read
13 cases cited (12 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Claim dismissed

The action is dismissed with costs.

Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 32, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided 16 December 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court Singapore International Commercial Court
Decided
Judge Simon Thorley
Charges / claim Tort, Restitution
Outcome Claim dismissed
Counsel Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, Withers KhattarWong LLP, Farahna Alam, Foo Xian Fong, Leong Li Shiong, Liew Min Yi Glenna, Tan Sheng An Jonathan, Vikram Nair

Source: [2024] SGHC(I) 32, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (8)

Parties (4)

Case Significance

da Silveira, Virgilio Tarrago and another v Hashstacs Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHC(I) 32 is a judgment of the Singapore International Commercial Court delivered by Simon Thorley IJ on 16 December 2024, in Originating Application No 7 of 2023. Between August and December 2019, the first claimant, Mr Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira, purchased on two cryptocurrency exchanges 8,063,470.53 "STACS Tokens", a form of cryptocurrency then worth in total around US$76,000, later transferring them in September 2020 to the second claimant, Munchetty Investments Ltd, a company he owned and controlled.

The claimants contended that Mr Silveira was induced to buy the tokens by representations for which the first defendant, Hashstacs Pte Ltd, was responsible, and that those representations were false. Hashstacs was associated with the second defendant, Mr Soh Kai Jun. The claimants brought claims against Hashstacs for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and negligent misstatement, and against both Hashstacs and Mr Soh for unjust enrichment and conspiracy, as reflected in the catchwords on negligence, conspiracy, unjust enrichment and fraud and deceit. The claimants were represented by Withers KhattarWong LLP and the defendants by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (including Vikram Nair). The judgment references the Misrepresentation Act, cites 13 authorities (12 Singapore, 1 foreign) and has been cited once.

[2024] SGHC(I) 32 explained

VIRGILIO TARRAGO DA SILVEIRA & Anor v HASHSTACS PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 32) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 16 December 2024. It is categorised under Tort and Restitution. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC(I) 32 about?

VIRGILIO TARRAGO DA SILVEIRA & Anor v HASHSTACS PTE. LTD. & Anor ([2024] SGHC(I) 32) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Tort — Negligence”, “Tort — Conspiracy”, “Restitution — Unjust enrichment”, and “Tort — Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC(I) 32 consider?

The judgment refers to Misrepresentation Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2024] SGHC(I) 32 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 145. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

How influential is [2024] SGHC(I) 32?

Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC(I) 32 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

What was claimed in da Silveira v Hashstacs Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC(I) 32?

In [2024] SGHC(I) 32, decided on 16 December 2024 by Simon Thorley IJ, Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira and Munchetty Investments Ltd claimed that false representations by Hashstacs Pte Ltd induced the purchase of 8,063,470.53 STACS Tokens worth around US$76,000, suing for misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and conspiracy.

What cryptocurrency was at issue in the Hashstacs SICC misrepresentation case ([2024] SGHC(I) 32)?

The case concerned STACS Tokens, a form of cryptocurrency. Between August and December 2019, Mr Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira bought 8,063,470.53 STACS Tokens on two exchanges, then worth around US$76,000, and in September 2020 transferred them to his company Munchetty Investments Ltd, per [2024] SGHC(I) 32.

Statutes Cited

Misrepresentation Act Cases on this Act →
s 2(1)

Cases Cited (13)

SG (3)
[2021] SGHC 155 [2021] SGHC 234 [2024] SGHC 145
SLR (9)
[2001] 2 SLR(R) 435 [2003] 3 SLR(R) 307 [2007] 4 SLR(R) 100 [2008] 1 SLR(R) 80 [2009] 2 SLR(R) 318 [2018] 1 SLR 818 [2018] 1 SLR 894 [2020] 3 SLR 1 [2021] 1 SLR 1
UK (1)
[1920] 3 KB 497

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC(I) 32)