Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd v Quek Sze Wei & Anor
Outcome
Appeal dismissedI dismissed the appeal and affirmed the partial summary judgment.
Source: [2024] SGHC 225, High Court (General Division), decided 2 September 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kwek Mean Luck |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
| Counsel | Audent Chambers LLC, Vita Law LLC, Jordan Tan, Lim Jun Heng, Sean La'Brooy, Victor Leong |
Source: [2024] SGHC 225, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd v Quek Sze Wei and another [2024] SGHC 225 was decided by Kwek Mean Luck J in the General Division of the High Court, heard on 29 August 2024 and decided on 2 September 2024, in Originating Claim No 589 of 2023 (Registrar's Appeal No 136 of 2024). The matter concerned summary judgment and an appellant seeking to resile from a factual concession. In SUM 1103 of 2024, the Assistant Registrar granted the claimant, Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd, partial summary judgment against the first defendant, Mr Quek Sze Wei, for damages in the sum of $131,535, a decision mainly premised on factual admissions made by Mr Quek.
In RA 136 of 2024, Mr Quek appealed against the Assistant Registrar's decision, raising arguments including that there were triable issues and that his factual admissions had been made in the context of an injunction hearing for the same action and so could not be relied upon in a summary judgment hearing. Kwek Mean Luck J dismissed the appeal and affirmed the partial summary judgment. According to the judgment, Mr Quek was the General Manager of Eurofins from around 2021 to 5 September 2023, and Eurofins' case was that while serving as General Manager and director he acquired a competitor, Labtechnic Testing Services Pte Ltd, the second defendant. Eurofins was represented by counsel from Audent Chambers LLC including Jordan Tan, Lim Jun Heng and Victor Leong, while the defendants were represented by Sean La'Brooy of Vita Law LLC.
Summary
Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd brought a claim against its former General Manager, Mr Quek Sze Wei, alleging that while serving as General Manager and director he acquired a competitor, Labtechnic Testing Services Pte Ltd, and arranged for 12 of Eurofins' employees to resign and join the competitor. An Assistant Registrar had granted Eurofins partial summary judgment of $131,535 against Mr Quek based largely on his factual admissions, and Mr Quek appealed, arguing there were triable issues and that his admissions had been made in the context of an injunction hearing. The High Court (Kwek Mean Luck J) dismissed the appeal, affirmed the partial summary judgment, declined to grant conditional leave to defend, and awarded Eurofins costs of $20,000 plus disbursements of $483.95.
What did Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd v Quek Sze Wei [2024] SGHC 225 decide?
In Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd v Quek Sze Wei [2024] SGHC 225, Kwek Mean Luck J dismissed Mr Quek's Registrar's Appeal and affirmed the partial summary judgment ordering him to pay Eurofins damages of $131,535, which had been premised mainly on his factual admissions.
Why did Mr Quek argue his admissions could not support summary judgment in [2024] SGHC 225?
Mr Quek argued in [2024] SGHC 225 that there were triable issues and that his factual admissions had been made in the context of an injunction hearing for the same action, so could not be relied upon for summary judgment; Kwek Mean Luck J rejected this and dismissed the appeal.
Cases Cited (7)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 225)