Audent Chambers LLC
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Audent Chambers LLC. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.
Audent Chambers LLC appears in 31 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Contract and Arbitration, and Audent Chambers LLC acted for the respondent in 9 and the plaintiff in 8.
- Reported cases
- 31
- Courts
- High Court, High Court (Appellate Division), High Court Registrar, Court of Appeal, District Court
- Period
- February 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 31 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Audent Chambers LLC — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Audent Chambers LLC appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 9 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 8 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 5 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the second defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the second defendant in S 275
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 8
- Appeal allowed
- 2
- Claim allowed
- 1
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 12 of the 31 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we dismiss the appeals by ES in their entirety.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“The claim is allowed in full.”
District Court · 17 July 2026 · [2026] SGDC 232 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim allowed -
“I dismiss the appeal in its entirety.”
High Court · 3 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 45 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“…the application is dismissed.”
High Court · 7 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 198 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed -
“We therefore dismissed the appeal with costs fixed in the aggregate sum of $40,000, with the usual order for payment out of security.”
Court of Appeal · 4 July 2025 · [2025] SGCA 32 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed -
“…we dismiss the appeal.”
Court of Appeal · 23 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 30 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
What areas of law does Audent Chambers LLC specialize in?
Civil Procedure 15 cases
Reported between February 2023 and September 2026.
Contract 5 cases
Reported between July 2023 and September 2026.
Arbitration 4 cases
Reported between July 2023 and October 2025.
Counsel named in these judgments (11)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Audent Chambers LLC in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (31)
-
The High Court allowed the claim and awarded Stamford Land $1,887,946.31 for its legal costs, with costs of the action and interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of judgment.
High Court · 29 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 202 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeals in their entirety, leaving the striking out and the judge's costs orders undisturbed.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC(A) 23 -
The District Judge allowed the claim in full and ordered the employee to pay the company damages of $119,490.14.
District Court · 17 July 2026 · [2026] SGDC 232 -
The court dismissed the application as premature, without prejudice to the creditors bringing a similar application at the appropriate time.
High Court · 30 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 93 -
Chua Lee Ming J allowed all three appeals, set aside the Assistant Registrar's orders and struck out Ever Strategy's claims against all the defendants.
High Court · 9 April 2026 · [2026] SGHC 76 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal in its entirety.
High Court · 3 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 45 -
The District Judge allowed the claim in part.
District Court · 19 December 2025 · [2025] SGDC 325 -
The High Court dismissed the application to set aside the award, finding no breach of natural justice and no excess of jurisdiction.
High Court · 7 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 198 -
The High Court allowed the winding-up application.
High Court · 19 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC 186 -
The court allowed both applications: it ordered the stay on OS 1193 lifted, joined JPM as the third respondent, and allowed consequential amendments limiting the relief to the return of the shares.
High Court Registrar · 27 August 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 29 -
The court ordered no stay or adjournment for Mr Ariffin, finding him fit and proper, and directed that his application be set down for hearing.
High Court · 8 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 156 -
The Court of Appeal, in grounds delivered by Steven Chong JCA, answered both legal questions in the negative and dismissed the appeal on 27 May 2025, upholding the setting aside of the permission to…
Court of Appeal · 4 July 2025 · [2025] SGCA 32 -
The Court of Appeal declined to hear the appeal on its merits, in the exercise of its power to control proceedings, and dismissed the appeal.
Court of Appeal · 23 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 30 -
The court allowed Yangbum's claim on resulting trusts, while its alternative claim on common intention constructive trusts failed.
High Court · 15 May 2025 · [2025] SGHC 93 -
The court allowed the appeal of SRK and TJCI (AD 22) and dismissed JGJ's appeal (AD 21), holding JGJ liable for the full invoiced sums with interest at 5.33% per annum, and varied the costs reduction…
High Court (Appellate Division) · 6 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC(A) 5 -
S Mohan J dismissed the claimant's appeal, holding that it had breached the unless order and that the specified consequences, the setting aside of the enforcement permission and dismissal of OA 222,…
High Court · 3 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 308 -
The High Court set the parameters for quantifying the plaintiffs' loss and ordered the parties to instruct their experts to agree the figure on that basis, with liberty to apply if no agreement was…
High Court · 5 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 228 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the partial summary judgment in favour of Eurofins for $131,535.
High Court · 2 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 225 -
Valerie Thean J granted Sentek permission to seek judicial review, finding an arguable case of reasonable suspicion, but dismissed the prayers for substantive relief, including the quashing and…
High Court · 27 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 213 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed SUM 643, ordered that the unless order take effect, set aside ORC 1189 and dismissed OA 222.
High Court Registrar · 25 July 2024 · [2024] SGHCR 7 -
The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' application, but only for the sole purpose of letting the Hong Kong court decide whether the defendant had breached its discovery order.
High Court · 25 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 106 -
The Appellate Division dismissed Luckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision in RA 206.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 5 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 7 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed SUM 2987 in part, granting seven of the eight categories sought, varying some by a refined timeframe, and refused the category of post-award communications, ordering…
High Court Registrar · 1 March 2024 · [2024] SGHCR 4 -
The High Court allowed the appeal and struck out the claim in OC 179, because the claimant's sole pleaded case was factually impossible on both parties' expert evidence.
High Court · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 308 -
Valerie Thean J dismissed both appeals, leaving the two Correction Directions in place.
High Court · 6 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 247 -
The Appellate Division (Kannan Ramesh JAD, Aedit Abdullah J and Quentin Loh SJ) dismissed the appeal in its entirety.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 26 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Assistant Registrar's production order.
High Court · 24 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC 198 -
The Assistant Registrar dismissed the intervention application and refused the trustee permission to participate in the proceedings in any capacity, whether as an added party or as an interested…
High Court Registrar · 20 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCR 23 -
Goh Yihan JC dismissed the application in SUM 1161 to admit new evidence and dismissed both appeals, RA 71 on the stay and RA 70 on summary judgment, so the Assistant Registrar's summary judgment for…
High Court · 8 June 2023 · [2023] SGHC 164 -
Chua Lee Ming J dismissed all of Sandy's claims in S 275 and all of Sam's claims in S 345.
High Court · 31 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 80 -
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the Mareva injunction.
Court of Appeal · 20 February 2023 · [2023] SGCA 6
In the court record
The reported judgments Audent Chambers LLC appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.
- In Conflict of Laws Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Audent Chambers LLC is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Restitution Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Audent Chambers LLC is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Statutory Interpretation Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Audent Chambers LLC is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Administrative Law Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Audent Chambers LLC is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Employment Law Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Audent Chambers LLC is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.