PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DAN
Outcome
Sentence imposedI sentenced the accused to 34 and a half years’ imprisonment, and a further six months’ imprisonment in lieu of 12 strokes of the cane.
Source: [2024] SGHC 250, High Court (General Division), decided 1 October 2024. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, Criminal Law |
| Outcome | Sentence imposed |
| Counsel | Advocatus Law LLP, Attorney-General's Chambers, Fleet Street Law LLC, Peter Low Chambers LLC, Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn, Derek Ee, Han Ming Kuang, Krishna Ramakrishna Sharma, Lim Yi Zheng, Loh Guo Wei Melvin, Maximilian Chew, Norine Tan |
Source: [2024] SGHC 250, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
Public Prosecutor v DAN [2024] SGHC 250 was decided by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah J in the General Division of the High Court, which heard the matter on 30 April and 9 July 2024 and delivered its grounds of decision on 1 October 2024 in Criminal Case No 19 of 2023. The accused, the father of a five-year-old girl referred to in the judgment as Ayeesha, was found to have killed her by repeated blows to her face after abusing her over a prolonged period, including slapping, punching, caning and kicking her and confining her to a toilet in the kitchen for nearly ten months; he also abused her brother, referred to as [R], who is protected by a gag order. The court recorded that the abuse began in 2015 when the child was three and that she died about two years later.
The accused pleaded guilty to a total of six charges, with 20 charges taken into consideration for sentencing. The charges engaged the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed), an offence under section 201 of the Penal Code, and statutory offences under the Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed). The prosecution was conducted by counsel from the Attorney-General's Chambers, including Han Ming Kuang, Derek Ee, Maximilian Chew and Norine Tan, while the accused was represented by counsel from Advocatus Law LLP, Fleet Street Law LLC and Peter Low Chambers LLC, including Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn, Krishna Ramakrishna Sharma, Lim Yi Zheng and Loh Guo Wei Melvin.
[2024] SGHC 250 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DAN ([2024] SGHC 250) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 1 October 2024. It is categorised under Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 4 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2024] SGHC 250 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DAN ([2024] SGHC 250) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Sentencing”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Section 201 Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed)”, “Criminal Law — Offences — Statutory offences — Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38, 2001 Rev Ed)”, and “Criminal Law — Offences — Culpable homicide not amounting to murder —Section 304(a) Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed)”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 250 consider?
The judgment refers to Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38), Criminal Law Reform Act, Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2024] SGHC 250?
Within this corpus, [2024] SGHC 250 has been cited by 4 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
In this General Division of the High Court matter, the accused, the father of a five-year-old girl named Ayeesha, pleaded guilty to six charges, with 20 further charges taken into consideration for sentencing, arising from the repeated abuse of his daughter and his son. The proceeded charges included one count of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under s 304(a) of the Penal Code for causing Ayeesha's death by smacking her face, multiple counts of ill-treatment of both children under the Children and Young Persons Act, and one charge under s 201 of the Penal Code. The court emphasised that the State's punishment must reflect society's abhorrence of such conduct and that those who caused the children's suffering had to be held accountable.
What offences did the accused plead guilty to in Public Prosecutor v DAN [2024] SGHC 250?
In [2024] SGHC 250, the accused pleaded guilty to six charges, with 20 charges taken into consideration. They engaged culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) and section 201 of the Penal Code, and offences under the Children and Young Persons Act.
Who decided Public Prosecutor v DAN and what did the case concern ([2024] SGHC 250)?
Public Prosecutor v DAN [2024] SGHC 250 was decided by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah J in the General Division of the High Court on 1 October 2024. It concerned the sentencing of a father who killed and repeatedly abused his five-year-old daughter, Ayeesha.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (26)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 250)