C

Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases are classified under Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn acted for the appellant in 2 and the accused in 2.

Reported cases
5
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
March 2024 to December 2025

Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn appeared

Counsel for the appellant
2 cases
Counsel for the defendant
1 case
Counsel for the accused
1 case
Counsel for the accused
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Sentence imposed
1
Appeal dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 5 cases.

What the courts decided

[2024] SGHC 250 Sentence imposed

“I sentenced the accused to 34 and a half years’ imprisonment, and a further six months’ imprisonment in lieu of 12 strokes of the cane.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v DAN · SGHC · · Counsel for the accused
[2024] SGCA 6 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismissed the appeal against conviction and sentence.”

Shen Hanjie v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGCA · · Counsel for the appellant

Parties in these cases

Ahmad Suhaimi bin Ismail2 Ravivarma Govindan1 Shen Hanjie1 Muhammed Izwan bin Borhan1 Muhammad Izwan bin Borhan1 DAN1

What areas of law does Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn practice?

Criminal Law 4 cases

Reported between March 2024 and December 2025.

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 2 cases

Reported between October 2024 and January 2025.

5
Appearances
4
Roles
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the appellant (2)

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Counsel for the accused (1)

Counsel for the accused (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →