FARM TO FORK SDN BHD v ADAMAS SG PTE LTD & Anor

[2024] SGHC 286 High Court (General Division) 14 November 2024 HC/S 752/2021 113 min read
39 cases cited (19 SG, 20 foreign)

Outcome

Claim dismissed

I thus dismiss the claim in relation to Mr Kim’s 3 September 2021 correspondence with Mr El Baze.

Source: [2024] SGHC 286, High Court (General Division), decided 14 November 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Andre Maniam
Charges / claim Contract, Confidence, Tort
Outcome Claim dismissed
Counsel Oon & Bazul LLP, WongPartnership LLP, Benedict Eoon, Hannah Lee, Tan Hoe Shuen, Tian Keyun

Source: [2024] SGHC 286, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (6)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd and another [2024] SGHC 286 was decided in the General Division of the High Court on 14 November 2024 by Andre Maniam J in Suit No 752 of 2021, following hearings across late January, February and July 2024. The plaintiff, Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd, is a Malaysian company founded in 2015 by Jonathan Weins, Christian Edelmann and Jessica Li. Under a consultancy agreement between Farm to Fork and the first defendant, Adamas Sg Pte Ltd, Adamas provided the services of the second defendant, Mr Kim Jin Wu, as chief financial officer of Farm to Fork from 11 May 2021 to 1 September 2021; Mr Kim is the sole shareholder and director of Adamas. The judgment frames the issues around a consultancy agreement that allowed either party to terminate by prior written notice: whether the client could instead terminate immediately with payment in lieu of notice, whether the agreement was immediately terminated where the client purported to do so but did not make payment, and whether the client must keep paying consultancy fees if the agreement remained in force despite the consultant having done no work since the purported termination. The case concerned breach of contract, breach of confidence and the tort of inducement of breach of contract, with reference to the Malaysian Contracts Act and the Specific Relief Act.

[2024] SGHC 286 explained

FARM TO FORK SDN BHD v ADAMAS SG PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGHC 286) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 14 November 2024. It is categorised under Contract, Confidence, and Tort. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2024] SGHC 286 about?

FARM TO FORK SDN BHD v ADAMAS SG PTE LTD & Anor ([2024] SGHC 286) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2024. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Breach”, “Confidence — Breach of confidence”, and “Tort — Inducement of breach of contract”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2024] SGHC 286 consider?

The judgment refers to Malaysian Contracts Act and Specific Relief Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

Summary

Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian company, sued Adamas Sg Pte Ltd and its sole director Mr Kim Jin Wu after Farm to Fork purported to terminate, with immediate effect, a consultancy agreement under which Mr Kim served as its chief financial officer, despite a clause requiring not less than three months' prior written notice and without paying the sum it had stated would be paid in lieu of notice. The claims included breach of contract, breach of confidence and inducement of breach of contract, while the defendants contended the agreement remained in force and counterclaimed for fees. The General Division of the High Court, per Andre Maniam J, dismissed Farm to Fork's claims and allowed Adamas's counterclaim only to the extent of ordering Farm to Fork to pay $66,660 plus interest.

What was Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd [2024] SGHC 286 about?

The case concerned a consultancy agreement under which Adamas Sg Pte Ltd supplied Kim Jin Wu as Farm to Fork's CFO from 11 May to 1 September 2021. Andre Maniam J considered termination by payment in lieu of notice, breach of contract and breach of confidence.

Who were the parties in Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd v Adamas Sg Pte Ltd ([2024] SGHC 286)?

The plaintiff was Farm to Fork Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian company founded in 2015 by Jonathan Weins, Christian Edelmann and Jessica Li. The defendants were Adamas Sg Pte Ltd and Kim Jin Wu, who was supplied as CFO and is the sole shareholder and director of Adamas.

Statutes Cited

Malaysian Contracts Act
s 28
Specific Relief Act
s 20(1)(b)

Cases Cited (39)

SG (2)
[2022] SGHC 144 [2023] SGHC 257
SLR (17)
[1992] 2 SLR(R) 575 [1999] 2 SLR(R) 592 [2000] 2 SLR(R) 407 [2005] 2 SLR(R) 579 [2014] 4 SLR 357 [2015] 5 SLR 1422 [2017] 2 SLR 592 [2017] 2 SLR 997 [2018] 1 SLR 818 [2020] 1 SLR 1130 [2020] 1 SLR 115 [2021] 3 SLR 600 [2022] 3 SLR 1211 [2023] 2 SLR 235 [2023] 3 SLR 191 [2023] 3 SLR 652 [2024] 3 SLR 1098
UK (12)
[1957] AC 488 [1962] 1 WLR 1411 [1968] 1 QB 396 [1969] 1 QB 699 [1972] Ch 305 [1974] 3 All ER 327 [1975] 1 WLR 482 [1979] 1 Ch 227 [1979] Ch 344 [1980] 3 WLR 713 [1982] 1 WLR 149 [2013] 1 AC 523
MY (8)
[1981] 1 MLJ 238 [1990] 3 MLJ 505 [2008] 8 CLJ 386 [2012] 10 CLJ 217 [2015] 5 CLJ 364 [2015] MLJU 2315 [2016] 6 CLJ 176 [2023] 7 CLJ 534

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2024] SGHC 286)