XTK v XTL
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 113 is a Family Court decision dated 24 October 2025 concerning Family Law. The judgment was delivered by Kevin Ho. The case was brought by XTK (applicant) against XTL (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Yeo & Associates LLC and Havelock Law Corporation. The judgment cites 10 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Evidence Act.
Summary
After 37 years of marriage, a husband sought to set aside the interim judgment of divorce — granted on a simplified uncontested basis with agreed terms — alleging he had signed the documents under duress, coercion and undue influence from the wife and her lawyer. The wife cross-applied for an extension of time to transfer the matrimonial flat. The Family Court dismissed the husband's application to set aside the interim judgment, finding his claims of duress were unsubstantiated, and granted the wife's extension of time for the flat transfer.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 113?
[2025] SGFC 113 (XTK v XTL) is a Family Court decision from 24 October 2025 addressing Family Law. The judgment was delivered by Kevin Ho.
Who were the parties in XTK v XTL?
The applicant in [2025] SGFC 113 was XTK, and the respondent was XTL. Legal representation included Yeo & Associates LLC and Havelock Law Corporation. The case was decided on 24 October 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 113?
[2025] SGFC 113 was delivered by Kevin Ho in the Family Court on 24 October 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 113 cite?
[2025] SGFC 113 cites 10 prior decisions. It references Evidence Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (10)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 113)