XTQ v XTR
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 116 is a Family Court decision dated 29 October 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing judicial separation. The judgment was delivered by Eugene Tay. The case was brought by XTQ (plaintiff) against XTR (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Gloria James-Civetta & Co and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The judgment cites 2 cases.
Summary
A wife filed for judicial separation on the ground of the husband's unreasonable behaviour after a 20-year marriage with no children, with the wife residing in Singapore and the husband in the United States. The husband contested the proceedings and had earlier unsuccessfully applied for a stay on the ground that India was the more appropriate forum. The Family Court granted the judicial separation, finding the husband's behaviour — including financial neglect, lack of emotional support, and misleading the wife about his career and finances — was such that the wife could not reasonably be expected to continue living with him.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 116?
[2025] SGFC 116 (XTQ v XTR) is a Family Court decision from 29 October 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically judicial separation. The judgment was delivered by Eugene Tay.
Who were the parties in XTQ v XTR?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGFC 116 was XTQ, and the defendant was XTR. Legal representation included Gloria James-Civetta & Co and PKWA Law Practice LLC. The case was decided on 29 October 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 116?
[2025] SGFC 116 was delivered by Eugene Tay in the Family Court on 29 October 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
Cases Cited (2)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 116)