XRO v XRP
Outcome
Application dismissedthe application was dismissed with costs.
Source: [2025] SGFC 99, Family Court, decided 19 September 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | Amy Lim Law Practice, Sterling Law Corporation, Amy Lim, Loo Liang Zhi |
Source: [2025] SGFC 99, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGFC 99 is a Family Court decision dated 19 September 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing division of matrimonial assets –variation of consent order. The judgment was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid. The case was brought by XRO (applicant) against XRP (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Amy Lim Law Practice and Sterling Law Corporation. The judgment cites 3 cases.
[2025] SGFC 99 explained
XRO v XRP ([2025] SGFC 99) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 19 September 2025. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGFC 99 about?
XRO v XRP ([2025] SGFC 99) is a Family Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Family Law – Division of matrimonial assets –Variation of consent order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGFC 99 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHCF 32. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
An application by a former wife to vary a consent order on the division of two jointly owned properties following a 2019 divorce. The court dismissed the application, finding no material change in circumstances warranting variation, and noting the wife was legally represented when she agreed to the original terms including adjustment clauses.
What was decided in [2025] SGFC 99?
[2025] SGFC 99 (XRO v XRP) is a Family Court decision from 19 September 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically division of matrimonial assets –variation of consent order. The judgment was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid.
Who were the parties in XRO v XRP ([2025] SGFC 99)?
The applicant in [2025] SGFC 99 was XRO, and the respondent was XRP. Legal representation included Sterling Law Corporation and Amy Lim Law Practice. The case was decided on 19 September 2025 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGFC 99?
[2025] SGFC 99 was delivered by Muhammad Hidhir Bin Abdul Majid in the Family Court on 19 September 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGFC 99 cite?
[2025] SGFC 99 cites 3 prior decisions.
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGFC 99)