EBIXCASH LIMITED & 3 Ors v ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & Anor
Outcome
Application dismissedThe application is dismissed with costs.
Source: [2025] SGHC(I) 23, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided 5 September 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Singapore International Commercial Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judges | Chua Lee Ming, Simon Thorley, Thomas Bathurst |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP, Cavinder Bull, Charlotte Tang, Divyesh Menon, Kelvin Poon, Shumin Lin, Vanessa Ku |
Source: [2025] SGHC(I) 23, Singapore International Commercial Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC(I) 23 is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision dated 5 September 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Simon Thorley, with Chua Lee Ming and Thomas Bathurst on the coram. The case was brought by Ebix Payment Services Pte Limited and others (applicant) against Vyoman India Private Limited and others (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 5 cases (2 Singapore, 3 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the Companies Act, and the International Arbitration Act.
[2025] SGHC(I) 23 explained
EBIXCASH LIMITED & 3 Ors v ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & Anor ([2025] SGHC(I) 23) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Singapore International Commercial Court on 5 September 2025. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC(I) 23 about?
EBIXCASH LIMITED & 3 Ors v ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & Anor ([2025] SGHC(I) 23) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration — Award — Recourse against award — Setting aside — Breach of natural justice”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC(I) 23 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), Companies Act (Cap 50), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC(I) 23 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC(I) 8. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
EbixCash entities applied to set aside a SIAC partial award on grounds of breach of natural justice, alleging the arbitrator failed to address certain arguments and reached findings without proper evidential basis. The SICC dismissed the application in its entirety, finding the arbitrator had addressed all essential issues and the applicants were engaged in an impermissible attempt to appeal on the merits of the award.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC(I) 23?
[2025] SGHC(I) 23 (EBIXCASH LIMITED & 3 Ors v ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & Anor) is a Singapore International Commercial Court decision from 5 September 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Simon Thorley.
Who were the parties in EBIXCASH LIMITED & 3 Ors v ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & Anor ([2025] SGHC(I) 23)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC(I) 23 was Ebix Payment Services Pte Limited, Ebix Singapore Pte Limited, and the respondent was Vyoman India Private Limited, Ashok Kumar Goel. Legal representation included Drew & Napier LLC and Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. The case was decided on 5 September 2025 in the Singapore International Commercial Court.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC(I) 23?
[2025] SGHC(I) 23 was delivered by Simon Thorley in the Singapore International Commercial Court on 5 September 2025. Chua Lee Ming and Thomas Bathurst also sat on the coram. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC(I) 23 cite?
[2025] SGHC(I) 23 cites 5 prior decisions, including 3 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Arbitration Act, Companies Act, International Arbitration Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC(I) 23)