DOM v DON
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (13)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 103 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 May 2025 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex. The case was brought by DOM (applicant) against DON (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Christopher Chuah Law Chambers LLC and Tan Kok Quan Partnership. The judgment cites 24 cases (23 Singapore, 1 foreign).
Summary
The applicant main contractor sought to set aside an arbitral award in a construction dispute, alleging breaches of natural justice including the tribunal's reliance on a witness's evidence that was tainted by fraud and alleged manipulation of invoices by the respondent's appointed contractors. The court allowed the application in part, setting aside the portions of the award relating to consultant fees totalling $247,126.50 but dismissing challenges to the remaining portions of the award.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 103?
[2025] SGHC 103 (DOM v DON) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 May 2025 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex.
Who were the parties in DOM v DON?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 103 was DOM, and the respondent was DON. Legal representation included Tan Kok Quan Partnership and Christopher Chuah Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 28 May 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 103?
[2025] SGHC 103 was delivered by Wong Li Kok, Alex in the High Court (General Division) on 28 May 2025. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 103 cite?
[2025] SGHC 103 cites 24 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (24)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 103)