DIANA BOOI YEE TZE v ANTHONY LEE ZHEN LIN

Q: Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 111 consider?

The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97), Penal Code (Cap 224), and Road Traffic Act (Cap 276). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2025] SGHC 111 High Court (General Division) 12 June 2025 HC/OC 322/2023 30 min read

9 cases cited

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	12 June 2025
Judge	Audrey Lim
Charges / claim	Tort
Counsel	Lee Shergill LLP, Securus Legal LLC, Koh Jia Min Desiree, Lee Ying Hui, Raj Singh Shergill, Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar

Source: [2025] SGHC 111, High Court (General Division), decided 12 June 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Tort — Negligence — Breach of duty Tort — Negligence — Contributory negligence

Practice Areas

Tort

Judges (1)

Audrey Lim Delivered

Counsel (6)

Lee Shergill LLP Firm Securus Legal LLC Firm Koh Jia Min Desiree Counsel Claimant Lee Ying Hui Counsel Defendant Raj Singh Shergill Counsel Claimant Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Anthony Lee Zhen Lin Defendant Diana Booi Yee Tze Claimant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 111 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 12 June 2025 concerning Tort, specifically addressing negligence. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Diana Booi Yee Tze (claimant) against Anthony Lee Zhen Lin (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Lee Shergill LLP and Securus Legal LLC. The judgment cites 9 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Evidence Act, the Penal Code, and the Road Traffic Act.

[2025] SGHC 111 explained

DIANA BOOI YEE TZE v ANTHONY LEE ZHEN LIN ([2025] SGHC 111) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 12 June 2025. It is categorised under Tort. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGHC 111 about?

DIANA BOOI YEE TZE v ANTHONY LEE ZHEN LIN ([2025] SGHC 111) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Tort — Negligence — Breach of duty” and “Tort — Negligence — Contributory negligence”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 111 consider?

The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97), Penal Code (Cap 224), and Road Traffic Act (Cap 276). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

Summary

A pedestrian was knocked down by a car while crossing a service road at a designated pedestrian crossing area near HDB blocks in Punggol. The court found the driver fully liable for negligence, holding he had breached his duty of care by wrongly traversing onto the outbound lane and failing to keep a proper lookout, and found no contributory negligence on the pedestrian's part.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 111?

[2025] SGHC 111 (DIANA BOOI YEE TZE v ANTHONY LEE ZHEN LIN) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 12 June 2025 addressing Tort, specifically negligence. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.

Who were the parties in DIANA BOOI YEE TZE v ANTHONY LEE ZHEN LIN ([2025] SGHC 111)?

The claimant in [2025] SGHC 111 was Diana Booi Yee Tze, and the defendant was Anthony Lee Zhen Lin. Legal representation included Lee Shergill LLP and Securus Legal LLC. The case was decided on 12 June 2025 in the High Court (General Division).