S

Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar

Securus Legal LLC · 2024–2025 Called to the Bar in 2013 3 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases are classified under Damages and Tort, and Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar acted for the defendant throughout.

Reported cases
3
Courts
SGHC, SGDC
Period
February 2024 to December 2025

Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar appeared

Counsel for the defendant
3 cases

Recorded outcomes

Claim allowed in part
1
Judgment for the plaintiff
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 3 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGDC 318 Claim allowed in part

“Accordingly, I award damages strictly limited to the compensable injuries supported by the evidence, together with the resultant loss of earnings and expenses incurred.”

CHAN KONG THOE v TRICILIA TANG PEI LU · SGDC · · Counsel for the defendant
[2024] SGHC 42 Judgment for the plaintiff

“Having considered the evidence and the submissions of the parties, I award the plaintiff damages in the sum of $3,378,231.99 as summarised at the conclusion of this judgment at [206].”

RAJINA SHARMA D/O RAJANDRAN v THEYVASIGAMANI S/O PERIASAMY & Anor · SGHC · · Counsel for the defendant

Parties in these cases

Song Teck Chong1 Jasmani bin Jaffar1 Theyvasigamani s/o Periasamy1 Rajina Sharma d/o Rajandran1 Anthony Lee Zhen Lin1 Diana Booi Yee Tze1 Tricilia Tang Pei Lu1 Chan Kong Thoe1

What areas of law does Shahira Binte Mohd Anuar practice?

3
Appearances
2013
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (3)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →