Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Audrey Lim |
| Charges / claim | Damages |
| Counsel | Titanium Law Chambers LLC, Willy Tay's Chambers, Koh Keh Jang Fendrick, Kym Calista Anstey, Tay Boon Chong Willy |
Source: [2025] SGHC 172, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 172 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 August 2025 concerning Damages, specifically addressing measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Fauzi bin Noh (plaintiff) against Zulkepli bin Husain (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 2 cases.
[2025] SGHC 172 explained
Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHC 172) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 28 August 2025. It is categorised under Damages. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 172 about?
Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHC 172) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Damages — Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases — Pre-trial loss of earnings”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 172 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHCR 22. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 172?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 172 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A motorcyclist injured in a collision with a lorry appealed the assessment of his pre-trial loss of earnings for the period after his employment was terminated due to his injuries. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding the plaintiff had taken reasonable steps to mitigate his loss by working in Malaysia at a lower salary after being unable to continue working in Singapore, and restored the full multiplicand of $3,500 per month for a 59-month period.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 172?
[2025] SGHC 172 (Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 August 2025 addressing Damages, specifically measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.
Who were the parties in Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHC 172)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 172 was Fauzi bin Noh, and the defendant was Zulkepli bin Husain. Legal representation included Willy Tay's Chambers and Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 28 August 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 172?
[2025] SGHC 172 was delivered by Audrey Lim in the High Court (General Division) on 28 August 2025. The case concerned Damages.
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Damages awarded in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 172)