Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain

[2025] SGHC 172 High Court (General Division) 28 August 2025 HC/S 239/2022 ( HC/RA 130/2025 )

2 cases cited Cited by 2 cases

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	28 August 2025
Judge	Audrey Lim
Charges / claim	Damages
Counsel	Titanium Law Chambers LLC, Willy Tay's Chambers, Koh Keh Jang Fendrick, Kym Calista Anstey, Tay Boon Chong Willy

Source: [2025] SGHC 172, High Court (General Division), decided 28 August 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Damages — Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases — Pre-trial loss of earnings

Practice Areas

Damages

Judges (1)

Audrey Lim Delivered

Counsel (5)

Titanium Law Chambers LLC Firm Willy Tay's Chambers Firm Koh Keh Jang Fendrick Counsel for the plaintiff Kym Calista Anstey Counsel for the plaintiff Tay Boon Chong Willy Counsel for the intervener

Parties (3)

MSIG Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd Intervener

Fauzi bin Noh Plaintiff

Zulkepli bin Husain Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 172 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 August 2025 concerning Damages, specifically addressing measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Fauzi bin Noh (plaintiff) against Zulkepli bin Husain (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 2 cases.

Summary

A motorcyclist injured in a collision with a lorry appealed the assessment of his pre-trial loss of earnings for the period after his employment was terminated due to his injuries. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding the plaintiff had taken reasonable steps to mitigate his loss by working in Malaysia at a lower salary after being unable to continue working in Singapore, and restored the full multiplicand of $3,500 per month for a 59-month period.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 172?

[2025] SGHC 172 (Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 August 2025 addressing Damages, specifically measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.

Who were the parties in Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHC 172)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 172 was Fauzi bin Noh, and the defendant was Zulkepli bin Husain. Legal representation included Willy Tay's Chambers and Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 28 August 2025 in the High Court (General Division).