Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Koh Keh Jang Fendrick |
| Charges / claim | Damages |
| Counsel | Titanium Law Chambers LLC, Willy Tay's Chambers, Koh Keh Jang Fendrick, Kym Calista Anstey, Tay Boon Chong Willy |
Source: [2025] SGHCR 22, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCR 22 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 14 July 2025 concerning Damages, specifically addressing measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Koh Keh Jang Fendrick. The case was brought by Fauzi bin Noh (plaintiff) against Zulkepli bin Husain (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 11 cases (9 Singapore, 2 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Road Traffic Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHCR 22 explained
Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHCR 22) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 14 July 2025. It is categorised under Damages. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHCR 22 about?
Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHCR 22) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Damages — Measure of damages — Personal injuries cases”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHCR 22 consider?
The judgment refers to Road Traffic Act (Cap 276). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2025] SGHCR 22?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHCR 22 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
A motorcyclist was injured in a collision with a motor lorry and brought proceedings for damages. The court assessed total damages of $469,857.50 less RM98,219, awarding $97,200 for pain and suffering, $147,000 for loss of future earnings based on a 7-year multiplier, $15,000 for loss of earning capacity, and special damages of $210,657.50 less RM66,619, subject to the 85% interlocutory judgment liability apportionment.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 22?
[2025] SGHCR 22 (Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain) is a High Court Registrar decision from 14 July 2025 addressing Damages, specifically measure of damages. The judgment was delivered by Koh Keh Jang Fendrick.
Who were the parties in Fauzi Bin Noh v Zulkepli Bin Husain ([2025] SGHCR 22)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 22 was Fauzi bin Noh, and the defendant was Zulkepli bin Husain. Legal representation included Willy Tay's Chambers and Titanium Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 14 July 2025 in the High Court Registrar.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 22?
[2025] SGHCR 22 was delivered by Koh Keh Jang Fendrick in the High Court Registrar on 14 July 2025. The case concerned Damages.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 22 cite?
[2025] SGHCR 22 cites 11 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Road Traffic Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Damages awarded in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 22)