TAN AI NGOH v SHAIK FARID BIN OLI ABDUL LATIFF

[2026] SGDC 106 District Court 30 March 2026 • DC/DC 1444/2021 ( DC/AD 428/2024 ) • 34 min read
9 cases cited

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Tan Ai Ngoh v Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff [2026] SGDC 106 is a District Court judgment on assessment of damages delivered by Deputy Registrar Lee Jia En Gloria on 30 March 2026, arising from a road traffic accident on 3 August 2018 in which the defendant's car struck the plaintiff, then a pedestrian aged 66. Parties had entered a consent interlocutory judgment in 2022 fixing liability at 80% in the plaintiff's favour, and the central disputes at the assessment hearing concerned whether residual knee pain was permanent and whether the plaintiff — aged 73 at the time of hearing — retained employability. Deputy Registrar Lee assessed damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis. Allister Lim Wee Sing of ALP Law Corporation appeared for the plaintiff; Tay Boon Chong Willy of Willy Tay's Chambers appeared for the defendant.

Summary

Tan Ai Ngoh, a pedestrian who was 66 years old at the time of a road traffic accident on 3 August 2018, claimed damages against the defendant driver Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff following a consent interlocutory judgment at 80% liability. The Deputy Registrar assessed total damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis, covering left knee injuries ($11,500), foot injuries ($6,000), scars ($4,000), PTSD ($3,000), head injuries ($3,000), loss of earning capacity ($5,000), pre-trial loss of earnings ($14,021.51), future medical expenses ($4,000), future transport expenses ($380), and medical expenses ($5,448.94).

How much was awarded in Tan Ai Ngoh v Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff [2026] SGDC 106?

Deputy Registrar Lee Jia En Gloria assessed damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis on 30 March 2026, arising from a 3 August 2018 road accident where Shaik Farid's car struck pedestrian Tan Ai Ngoh (then 66 years old), with liability fixed at 80% by consent interlocutory judgment in 2022.

Cases Cited (9)

SG (6)
[2003] SGHC 279 [2004] SGHC 43 [2017] SGHC 304 [2018] SGCA 74 [2023] SGDC 167 [2025] SGHC 172
SLR (3)
[2018] 3 SLR 244 [2019] 1 SLR 145 [2019] 1 SLR 230

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 106)