TAN AI NGOH v SHAIK FARID BIN OLI ABDUL LATIFF
Outcome
Appeal allowedthe appeal was allowed, it does not appear that this point was overruled.
Source: [2026] SGDC 106, District Court, decided 30 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Lee Jia En Gloria |
| Charges / claim | Damages |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed |
| Counsel | ALP Law Corporation, Willy Tay's Chambers, Allister Lim Wee Sing, Tay Boon Chong Willy |
Source: [2026] SGDC 106, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
Tan Ai Ngoh v Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff [2026] SGDC 106 is a District Court judgment on assessment of damages delivered by Deputy Registrar Lee Jia En Gloria on 30 March 2026, arising from a road traffic accident on 3 August 2018 in which the defendant's car struck the plaintiff, then a pedestrian aged 66. Parties had entered a consent interlocutory judgment in 2022 fixing liability at 80% in the plaintiff's favour, and the central disputes at the assessment hearing concerned whether residual knee pain was permanent and whether the plaintiff — aged 73 at the time of hearing — retained employability. Deputy Registrar Lee assessed damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis. Allister Lim Wee Sing of ALP Law Corporation appeared for the plaintiff; Tay Boon Chong Willy of Willy Tay's Chambers appeared for the defendant.
[2026] SGDC 106 explained
TAN AI NGOH v SHAIK FARID BIN OLI ABDUL LATIFF ([2026] SGDC 106) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 30 March 2026. It is categorised under Damages. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 106 about?
TAN AI NGOH v SHAIK FARID BIN OLI ABDUL LATIFF ([2026] SGDC 106) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Damages — Measure of damages — Personal injury cases”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGDC 106 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 172. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
Tan Ai Ngoh, a pedestrian who was 66 years old at the time of a road traffic accident on 3 August 2018, claimed damages against the defendant driver Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff following a consent interlocutory judgment at 80% liability. The Deputy Registrar assessed total damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis, covering left knee injuries ($11,500), foot injuries ($6,000), scars ($4,000), PTSD ($3,000), head injuries ($3,000), loss of earning capacity ($5,000), pre-trial loss of earnings ($14,021.51), future medical expenses ($4,000), future transport expenses ($380), and medical expenses ($5,448.94).
How much was awarded in Tan Ai Ngoh v Shaik Farid bin Oli Abdul Latiff [2026] SGDC 106?
Deputy Registrar Lee Jia En Gloria assessed damages at $56,350 on a 100% basis on 30 March 2026, arising from a 3 August 2018 road accident where Shaik Farid's car struck pedestrian Tan Ai Ngoh (then 66 years old), with liability fixed at 80% by consent interlocutory judgment in 2022.
Cases Cited (9)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Damages awarded in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 106)