HOMEE PTE. LTD. v Hah Biang Kian Terence
Outcome
Appeal allowedThe appeal is allowed.
Source: [2025] SGHC 203, High Court (General Division), decided 15 October 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Outcome | Appeal allowed |
| Counsel | Adel Law LLC, Subra TT Law LLC, A. Thamiselvan, Mohammed Shakirin Bin Abdul Rashid, Nur Amalina Binte Saparin, Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli |
Source: [2025] SGHC 203, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 203 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 15 October 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Homee Pte Ltd (appellant) against Hah Biang Kian Terence (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Subra TT Law LLC and Adel Law LLC. The judgment cites 1 case.
[2025] SGHC 203 explained
HOMEE PTE. LTD. v Hah Biang Kian Terence ([2025] SGHC 203) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 15 October 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 203 about?
HOMEE PTE. LTD. v Hah Biang Kian Terence ([2025] SGHC 203) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders — Setting aside regular default judgment”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
Homee Pte Ltd, a student hostel operator, appealed against the refusal to set aside a default judgment obtained by the property purchaser who had served a termination notice after buying the property subject to an existing tenancy. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding triable issues existed regarding the purchaser's right to terminate the tenancy before the prior owner's notice period had elapsed, and that the delay in bringing the setting-aside application was explained by the director's unfamiliarity with Singapore court processes.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 203?
[2025] SGHC 203 (HOMEE PTE. LTD. v Hah Biang Kian Terence) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 15 October 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in HOMEE PTE. LTD. v Hah Biang Kian Terence ([2025] SGHC 203)?
The appellant in [2025] SGHC 203 was Homee Pte Ltd, and the respondent was Hah Biang Kian Terence. Legal representation included Subra TT Law LLC and Adel Law LLC. The case was decided on 15 October 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 203?
[2025] SGHC 203 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (General Division) on 15 October 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
Cases Cited (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 203)