Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, and Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli acted for the defendant in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court, High Court Registrar
- Period
- August 2024 to October 2025
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 1
- Application dismissed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“The appeal is allowed.”
High Court · 15 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 203 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed -
“…the application was dismissed with costs to the respondent.”
High Court · 9 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 231 · Counsel for the applicant · Application dismissed -
“I dismissed the appeal with costs to the respondent fixed at $8,000 all-in.”
High Court · 2 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 199 · Counsel for the defendant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Umar Abdullah bin Mazeli practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The High Court allowed the appeal, finding triable issues and an acceptable explanation for the delay, and directed the parties to file submissions on costs within seven days.
High Court · 15 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 203
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The Assistant Registrar dismissed the defendant's setting-aside application, with the defendant liable for the claimants' costs of it.
High Court Registrar · 29 September 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 33 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the bankruptcy order, with costs to the respondent fixed at $8,000 all-in.
High Court · 2 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC 199
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
Goh Yihan J dismissed the application with costs to the respondent, holding that it was neither necessary nor expedient to order a sale because the application was insufficiently particularised and…
High Court · 9 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 231