TEO CHEE WEI, KELVIN v WONG LULONG, WILSON & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Audrey Lim |
| Charges / claim | Trust, Equity, Agency |
| Counsel | Aptus Law Corporation, Dhillon & Panoo LLC, Jasjeet Singh s/o Harjinder Singh, Liew Chen Mine |
Source: [2025] SGHC 210, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 210 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 27 October 2025 concerning Agency, Equity, and Trust, specifically addressing express trusts, dishonest assistance, and evidence of agency. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim. The case was brought by Teo Chee Wei Kelvin (plaintiff) against Crowdex Global Pte Ltd and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Aptus Law Corporation and Dhillon & Panoo LLC. The judgment cites 11 cases and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Evidence Act and the Moneylenders Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
[2025] SGHC 210 explained
TEO CHEE WEI, KELVIN v WONG LULONG, WILSON & Anor ([2025] SGHC 210) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 27 October 2025. It is categorised under Trust, Equity, and Agency. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 210 about?
TEO CHEE WEI, KELVIN v WONG LULONG, WILSON & Anor ([2025] SGHC 210) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Trust — Express trusts — Breach — Remedies”, “Equity — Dishonest assistance — Breach — Remedies”, and “Agency — Evidence of agency — Duties of agent — Breach — Remedies”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 210 consider?
The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97) and Moneylenders Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 210 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC(A) 17. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2025] SGHC 210?
Within this corpus, [2025] SGHC 210 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
Kelvin Teo claimed his Porsche 911 Carrera S Coupe was transferred to a company as collateral for a $350,000 loan arranged by Wilson, his car dealer friend and agent, but was wrongfully repossessed due to the defendants' fault. The court found Wilson and Crowdex jointly and severally liable for $97,310 in damages for breach of trust, fiduciary duties, and dishonest assistance, and allowed Wilson's counterclaim for $30,000 in unpaid personal loans.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 210?
[2025] SGHC 210 (TEO CHEE WEI, KELVIN v WONG LULONG, WILSON & Anor) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 27 October 2025 addressing Agency, Equity, and Trust, specifically express trusts, dishonest assistance, and evidence of agency. The judgment was delivered by Audrey Lim.
Who were the parties in TEO CHEE WEI, KELVIN v WONG LULONG, WILSON & Anor ([2025] SGHC 210)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 210 was Teo Chee Wei Kelvin, and the defendant was Crowdex Global Pte Ltd, Wong Lulong Wilson. Legal representation included Dhillon & Panoo LLC and Aptus Law Corporation. The case was decided on 27 October 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 210?
[2025] SGHC 210 was delivered by Audrey Lim in the High Court (General Division) on 27 October 2025. The case concerned Agency, Equity, and Trust.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 210 cite?
[2025] SGHC 210 cites 11 prior decisions. It references Evidence Act, Moneylenders Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (11)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 210)