XXG v XXH

[2026] SGFC 2 Family Court 6 January 2026 HCF/DCA 106/2025 · HCF/DCA 107/2025 37 min read
14 cases cited (13 SG, 1 foreign)

Key facts

Court Family Court
Decided
Judge Azmin Jailani
Charges / claim Family Law
Counsel Dhillon & Panoo LLC, Jasjeet Singh

Source: [2026] SGFC 2, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

[2026] SGFC 2 is a Family Court decision dated 6 January 2026 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing family violence. The judgment was delivered by Azmin Jailani. The case was brought by XXG (appellant) against XXH (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Dhillon & Panoo LLC. The judgment cites 14 cases (13 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 2 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code and the Penal Code.

[2026] SGFC 2 explained

XXG v XXH ([2026] SGFC 2) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 6 January 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGFC 2 about?

XXG v XXH ([2026] SGFC 2) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law – Family Violence – Causing Hurt”, “Family Law – Family Violence – Procedure – Effect of withdrawal dismissal”, “Family Law – Family Violence – Procedure – Failure to include incidents of family violence in complaint form”, and “Family Law – Family Violence – Effect of warnings issued by Family Law – Family Violence – Reasoning by propensity”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGFC 2 consider?

The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGFC 2 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHCF 52, [2025] SGHCF 14, and [2024] SGHC 331. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

Former spouses filed cross-applications for personal protection orders against each other following an incident at the ex-wife's residence. The court granted the ex-husband's PPO application and dismissed the ex-wife's, finding the ex-wife had committed family violence by pulling the ex-husband's hair during the incident, and ordered both parties to attend counselling to address their underlying conflict and co-parenting issues.

What was decided in [2026] SGFC 2?

[2026] SGFC 2 (XXG v XXH) is a Family Court decision from 6 January 2026 addressing Family Law, specifically family violence. The judgment was delivered by Azmin Jailani.

Who were the parties in XXG v XXH ([2026] SGFC 2)?

The appellant in [2026] SGFC 2 was XXG, and the respondent was XXH. Legal representation included Dhillon & Panoo LLC. The case was decided on 6 January 2026 in the Family Court.

Which judge decided [2026] SGFC 2?

[2026] SGFC 2 was delivered by Azmin Jailani in the Family Court on 6 January 2026. The case concerned Family Law.

What cases and statutes does [2026] SGFC 2 cite?

[2026] SGFC 2 cites 14 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Penal Code.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (14)

SG (10)
[2012] SGDC 360 [2018] SGFC 53 [2019] SGFC 27 [2019] SGFC 6 [2022] SGHCF 31 [2024] SGFC 103 [2024] SGHC 331 [2025] SGFC 30 [2025] SGHCF 14 [2025] SGHCF 52
SLR (3)
[2003] 3 SLR(R) 356 [2007] 1 SLR(R) 453 [2016] 1 SLR 1370
UK (1)
[1976] 1 WLR 1251

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 2)