TJIANG GIOK MOY & Anor v ANG JIMMY TJUN MIN
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 236 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 1 December 2025 concerning Equity, specifically addressing estoppel and fiduciary relationships. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck. The case was brought by Banner (China) Investment Company Limited and others (plaintiff) against Ang Jimmy Tjun Min (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Davinder Singh Chambers LLC and Joo Toon LLC. The judgment cites 24 cases (21 Singapore, 3 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Companies Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
Summary
A mother and daughter sued the son/brother for approximately $2 million in unauthorised withdrawals from a joint Citibank account, while the family investment company Banner sued the same defendant for return of an $11 million advance. The court allowed both claims, finding that the defendant failed to prove he was authorised to make the withdrawals or that the advance was a gift, and ordered repayment with interest.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 236?
[2025] SGHC 236 (TJIANG GIOK MOY & Anor v ANG JIMMY TJUN MIN) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 1 December 2025 addressing Equity, specifically estoppel and fiduciary relationships. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck.
Who were the parties in TJIANG GIOK MOY & Anor v ANG JIMMY TJUN MIN?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 236 was Banner (China) Investment Company Limited, Ang Eileen, and the defendant was Ang Jimmy Tjun Min. Legal representation included Davinder Singh Chambers LLC and Joo Toon LLC. The case was decided on 1 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 236?
[2025] SGHC 236 was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck in the High Court (General Division) on 1 December 2025. The case concerned Equity.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 236 cite?
[2025] SGHC 236 cites 24 prior decisions, including 3 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Companies Act. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (24)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 236)