Banner (China) Investment Company Limited v Ang Jimmy Tjun Min
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kwek Mean Luck |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Davinder Singh Chambers, PDLegal LLC, Chua Ze Xuan, Jaikanth Shankar, Ng Shu Wen, Quek Wen Jiang, Gerard, Sumedha Madhusudhanan, Waverly Seong |
Source: [2025] SGHC 12, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 12 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 20 January 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing selection of specimen signatures for submission to handwriting expert. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck. The case was brought by Banner (China) Investment Company Limited (claimant) against Ang Jimmy Tjun Min (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Davinder Singh Chambers and PDLegal LLC. The judgment cites 1 case (0 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Evidence Act.
[2025] SGHC 12 explained
Banner (China) Investment Company Limited v Ang Jimmy Tjun Min ([2025] SGHC 12) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 20 January 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 12 about?
Banner (China) Investment Company Limited v Ang Jimmy Tjun Min ([2025] SGHC 12) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Selection of specimen signatures for submission to handwriting expert — Manner of verifying authenticity of authorship of specimen signatures”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 12 consider?
The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
In a dispute over an alleged S$11 million loan evidenced by an audit confirmation, the court gave directions on the process for obtaining signature specimens for handwriting analysis where the defendant disputed the authenticity of his signature. The court directed the corporate secretarial services company to first identify at least 15 documents the defendant would clearly have signed, rejecting the defendant's attempt to select his own signature specimens.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 12?
[2025] SGHC 12 (Banner (China) Investment Company Limited v Ang Jimmy Tjun Min) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 20 January 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically selection of specimen signatures for submission to handwriting expert. The judgment was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck.
Who were the parties in Banner (China) Investment Company Limited v Ang Jimmy Tjun Min ([2025] SGHC 12)?
The claimant in [2025] SGHC 12 was Banner (China) Investment Company Limited, and the defendant was Ang Jimmy Tjun Min. Legal representation included Davinder Singh Chambers and PDLegal LLC. The case was decided on 20 January 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 12?
[2025] SGHC 12 was delivered by Kwek Mean Luck in the High Court (General Division) on 20 January 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (1)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 12)