Waverly Seong
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Waverly Seong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Waverly Seong appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Trusts, and Waverly Seong acted for the defendant in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal
- Period
- May 2023 to April 2025
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Waverly Seong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Waverly Seong appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“The appeal was accordingly dismissed.”
Court of Appeal · 30 April 2025 · [2025] SGCA 20 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Waverly Seong practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming that Patricia and Evelyn held the legal title to the joint accounts on a resulting trust for Dr Khoo's estate.
Court of Appeal · 30 April 2025 · [2025] SGCA 20
Counsel for the claimant (1)
-
The court held that Mr Ang had no right to select the specimen signatures and that the Directions were a proper process for surfacing authentic specimens.
High Court · 20 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 12
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The High Court allowed the plaintiffs' claim in part and dismissed the counterclaim.
High Court · 31 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 314 -
The High Court allowed the claim in part, giving Huizhou Xinsheng judgment for RMB 14m in damages for breach of the duty of diligence, with interest at 5.33% a year from the date of the writ, and…
High Court · 26 May 2023 · [2023] SGHC 127