WISH CONTROLS PTE. LTD. v TRIDENT WATER SYSTEMS PTE. LTD.

[2025] SGHC 267 High Court (General Division) 31 December 2025 HC/OC 479/2024 ( HC/SUM 516/2025 ) 3 min read
1 cases cited

Key facts

Court High Court (General Division)
Decided
Judge Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim Civil Procedure
Counsel Francis Khoo & Lim, PDLegal LLC, Gerard Quek Wen Jiang, Glenn Chua Ze Xuan, Ranjit Singh

Source: [2025] SGHC 267, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 267 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 31 December 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing costs. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Wish Controls Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Trident Water Systems Pte Ltd (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Francis Khoo & Lim and PDLegal LLC. The judgment cites 1 case.

[2025] SGHC 267 explained

WISH CONTROLS PTE. LTD. v TRIDENT WATER SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. ([2025] SGHC 267) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 31 December 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2025] SGHC 267 about?

WISH CONTROLS PTE. LTD. v TRIDENT WATER SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. ([2025] SGHC 267) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Costs”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 267 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 256. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

Following the merits judgment in Wish Controls v Trident Water Systems where the claimant was awarded $522,747.54 and the defendant was awarded $3,000 in nominal damages, the court dealt with costs. The court ordered the defendant to pay the claimant $80,418.25 all-in after setting off the parties' costs obligations, awarding $80,000 plus disbursements for the main claim and $6,000 nominal costs for the partially successful counterclaim.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 267?

[2025] SGHC 267 (WISH CONTROLS PTE. LTD. v TRIDENT WATER SYSTEMS PTE. LTD.) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 31 December 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically costs. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in WISH CONTROLS PTE. LTD. v TRIDENT WATER SYSTEMS PTE. LTD. ([2025] SGHC 267)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 267 was Wish Controls Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Trident Water Systems Pte Ltd. Legal representation included PDLegal LLC and Francis Khoo & Lim. The case was decided on 31 December 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 267?

[2025] SGHC 267 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (General Division) on 31 December 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.

Cases Cited (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 267)