Ranjit Singh
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Ranjit Singh. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Ranjit Singh appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and Ranjit Singh acted for the plaintiff in 2 and the defendant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 6
- Courts
- High Court, District Court, Protection from Harassment Court, High Court (Family Division)
- Period
- July 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Ranjit Singh — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Ranjit Singh appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim allowed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 6 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“The Claim is allowed.”
High Court · 18 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 256 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim allowed -
“I dismissed the appeal.”
High Court (Family Division) · 14 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 31 · Counsel for the third party · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Ranjit Singh practice?
Civil Procedure 2 cases
Reported between August 2023 and December 2025.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 2 cases
Reported between July 2023 and September 2026.
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The District Court sentenced the accused to 10 months' imprisonment and disqualified him from holding or obtaining all classes of driving licence for five years from his release.
District Court · 18 September 2026 · [2026] SGDC 304
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
The Protection from Harassment Court (Judge Jasbendar Kaur) dismissed the committal application.
Protection from Harassment Court · 26 May 2026 · [2026] SGPHC 2
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
The court ordered Trident to pay Wish Controls costs of $80,000 plus disbursements of $6,418.25 for the main action, ordered Wish Controls to pay Trident fixed costs of $6000 all-in for the…
High Court · 31 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 267 -
The court allowed the claim and ordered Trident to pay Wish Controls $522,747.54 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the originating claim to judgment.
High Court · 18 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 256
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
See Kee Oon J allowed Mr Blomberg's appeal against the setting aside of the consent order, with costs to be determined in his favour.
High Court · 30 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 238
Counsel for the third party (1)
-
The High Court (Family Division) dismissed the appeal and upheld the order for 21 months at the Singapore Girls' Home.
High Court (Family Division) · 14 July 2023 · [2023] SGHCF 31