WPG v WPF
Outcome
Appeal dismissed“I dismissed the appeal.”
Source: [2025] SGHCF 19, High Court (Family Division), decided 5 March 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Courts and Jurisdiction |
| Outcome | Appeal dismissed |
Source: [2025] SGHCF 19, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCF 19 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 5 March 2025 concerning Courts and Jurisdiction, specifically addressing judges. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by WPG (appellant) against WPF (respondent). The judgment cites 2 cases.
Summary
An appeal against the District Judge's refusal to recuse himself from divorce proceedings, where the appellant husband claimed the judge was biased for proceeding with a trial despite a medical report certifying him unfit to attend court. The court dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence of bias and that the judge's procedural decision to proceed was within his discretion.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 19?
[2025] SGHCF 19 (WPG v WPF) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 5 March 2025 addressing Courts and Jurisdiction, specifically judges. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in WPG v WPF ([2025] SGHCF 19)?
The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 19 was WPG, and the respondent was WPF. The case was decided on 5 March 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCF 19?
[2025] SGHCF 19 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (Family Division) on 5 March 2025. The case concerned Courts and Jurisdiction.
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCF 19)