THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION v PRETTY VIEW SHIPPING S.A. & 2 Ors

[2025] SGHCR 16 High Court Registrar 26 May 2025 • HC/OS 207/2022 ( HC/SUM 650/2025 ) • 77 min read
19 cases cited (15 SG, 4 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Service — Setting aside Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders — Enforcement — Examination of judgment debtor

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Perry Peh Delivered

Counsel (6)

LVM Law Chambers LLC Firm WongPartnership LLP Firm Chia Kia Pheng Counsel Defendant Lin Chunlong Counsel Plaintiff Lucas Wong Counsel Plaintiff Tian Keyun Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

Parakou Tankers Inc Defendant Pretty Urban Shopping SA Defendant Pretty View Shipping SA Defendant Third Eye Capital Corp Plaintiff

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCR 16 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 26 May 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing service and judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Perry Peh. The case was brought by Third Eye Capital Corp (plaintiff) against Parakou Tankers Inc and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by WongPartnership LLP and LVM Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 19 cases (15 Singapore, 4 foreign) and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Legal Profession Act.

Summary

Third Eye Capital sought to set aside the defendant's application to challenge the service of a second examination of judgment debtor order and the order itself. The court dismissed the setting aside application, finding that electronic service through e-Litigation on the defendants' solicitors constituted effective service, and that the plaintiff had satisfied its duty of full and frank disclosure in the ex parte application for the examination order.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 16?

[2025] SGHCR 16 (THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION v PRETTY VIEW SHIPPING S.A. & 2 Ors) is a High Court Registrar decision from 26 May 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically service and judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Perry Peh.

Who were the parties in THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION v PRETTY VIEW SHIPPING S.A. & 2 Ors?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 16 was Third Eye Capital Corp, and the defendant was Parakou Tankers Inc, Pretty Urban Shopping SA. Legal representation included WongPartnership LLP and LVM Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 26 May 2025 in the High Court Registrar.

Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 16?

[2025] SGHCR 16 was delivered by Perry Peh in the High Court Registrar on 26 May 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 16 cite?

[2025] SGHCR 16 cites 19 prior decisions, including 4 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Legal Profession Act.

Statutes Cited

Legal Profession Act (Cap 161)
s 59(3)

Cases Cited (19)

SG (1)
[2015] SGHCR 3
SLR (14)
[2008] 4 SLR(R) 365 [2008] 4 SLR(R) 460 [2008] 4 SLR(R) 994 [2010] 3 SLR 294 [2010] 3 SLR 542 [2013] 4 SLR 1116 [2014] 3 SLR 381 [2016] 2 SLR 118 [2017] 4 SLR 789 [2019] 1 SLR 779 [2020] 2 SLR 725 [2024] 2 SLR 401 [2024] 3 SLR 807 [2024] 4 SLR 1304
UK (4)
[1906] 1 Ch 692 [1944] 1 KB 193 [2020] EWHC 426 [2023] QB 186

Cited By (1)

[2026] SGCA 7
Owner of the vessel(s) CHLOE V (IMO No. 9457452) v UBS AG

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 16)