KHARTIK JASUDASS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Q: Which legislation does [2026] SGCA 11 consider?

The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2026] SGCA 11 Court of Appeal 10 March 2026 CA/CM 1/2026 11 min read

8 cases cited

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeals were dismissed (Khartik (CM 19) at [10]).

Source: [2026] SGCA 11, Court of Appeal, decided 10 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court	Court of Appeal
Decided	10 March 2026
Judge	Tay Yong Kwang
Charges / claim	Criminal Procedure and Sentencing
Outcome	Appeal dismissed
Counsel	Attorney-General's Chambers, Anandan Bala, Marcus Foo, Sarah Siaw

Source: [2026] SGCA 11, Court of Appeal, decided 10 March 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Criminal review — Permission for review — Section 394H Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed)

Practice Areas

Criminal Procedure and Sentencing

Judges (1)

Tay Yong Kwang Delivered

Counsel (4)

Attorney-General's Chambers Firm Anandan Bala Counsel Respondent Marcus Foo Counsel Respondent Sarah Siaw Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Public Prosecutor Respondent Khartik Jasudass Applicant

[2026] SGCA 11 explained

KHARTIK JASUDASS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2026] SGCA 11) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Court of Appeal on 10 March 2026. It is categorised under Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGCA 11 about?

KHARTIK JASUDASS v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ([2026] SGCA 11) is a Court of Appeal decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Criminal review — Permission for review — Section 394H Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed)”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGCA 11 consider?

The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGCA 11 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGCA 22. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.