ALBERT NEO HEE SONG v TANG LAY ENG
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Sim Mei Ling |
| Charges / claim | Contract |
| Counsel | Parwani Law LLC, Templars Law LLC, Kenrick Lam, Vijai Dharamdas Parwani |
Source: [2026] SGDC 13, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2026] SGDC 13 is a District Court decision dated 6 January 2026 concerning Contract, specifically addressing contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Sim Mei Ling. The case was brought by Albert Neo Hee Song (plaintiff) against Tang Lay Eng (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Parwani Law LLC and Templars Law LLC. The judgment cites 2 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the Evidence Act.
[2026] SGDC 13 explained
ALBERT NEO HEE SONG v TANG LAY ENG ([2026] SGDC 13) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 6 January 2026. It is categorised under Contract. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 13 about?
ALBERT NEO HEE SONG v TANG LAY ENG ([2026] SGDC 13) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Contractual terms — Parol evidence rule”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 13 consider?
The judgment refers to Evidence Act (Cap 97). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
A plaintiff sued on an Acknowledgement of Debt for $72,400 signed by the defendant and her husband, while the defendant contended the money was the plaintiff's investment in her husband's business. The court allowed the claim, finding the parol evidence rule applied and the defendant failed to rebut the presumption that the document represented the parties' entire agreement.
What was decided in [2026] SGDC 13?
[2026] SGDC 13 (ALBERT NEO HEE SONG v TANG LAY ENG) is a District Court decision from 6 January 2026 addressing Contract, specifically contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Sim Mei Ling.
Who were the parties in ALBERT NEO HEE SONG v TANG LAY ENG ([2026] SGDC 13)?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGDC 13 was Albert Neo Hee Song, and the defendant was Tang Lay Eng. Legal representation included Parwani Law LLC and Templars Law LLC. The case was decided on 6 January 2026 in the District Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGDC 13?
[2026] SGDC 13 was delivered by Sim Mei Ling in the District Court on 6 January 2026. The case concerned Contract.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 13)