WENDY DANUBRATA v J+F PRIVATE LIMITED & Anor

Q: Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 215 consider?

The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50) and Misrepresentation Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

[2026] SGDC 215 District Court 2 July 2026 • DC/OC 876/2025 • 11 min read

4 cases cited (2 SG, 2 foreign)

Key facts

Court	District Court
Decided	2 July 2026
Judge	Evans Ng
Charges / claim	Contract, Tort
Counsel	Apex Law LLC, Yeo Marini Law Corporation, Chidambaram Selvaraj, Ow Kim Chuan Jonathan, Yeo Wei Yang Wilson

Source: [2026] SGDC 215, District Court, decided 2 July 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Contract — Misrepresentation Act Tort — Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit Tort — Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation

Practice Areas

Contract Tort

Judges (1)

Evans Ng Delivered

Counsel (5)

Apex Law LLC Firm Yeo Marini Law Corporation Firm Chidambaram Selvaraj Counsel 2nd Defendant Ow Kim Chuan Jonathan Counsel 2nd Defendant Yeo Wei Yang Wilson Counsel Claimant

Parties (3)

J+F Private Limited Defendant Diana Goh Geok Lee Defendant Wendy Danubrata Claimant

Case Significance

In Wendy Danubrata v J+F Private Limited and another [2026] SGDC 215, decided by District Judge Evans Ng on 2 July 2026, the District Court examined a claim arising from a property investment agreement dated 5 May 2022 under which the claimant Wendy Danubrata paid a $100,000 cashier's order to J+F Private Limited in connection with the purchase of a unit at 61 Telok Blangah Heights, Singapore 100061. The agreement promised annual dividends of $15,000 from 4 May 2023 and return of capital with a fourth dividend on 4 May 2026, but after the second dividend was paid in May 2024, the company's director Jason Fong divorced his then-wife and co-defendant Diana Goh Geok Lee in November 2024, then absconded, and defaults followed. The claim, heard over hearings on 31 March and 15 May 2026, drew on the Companies Act and the Misrepresentation Act and cited four authorities, two of them Singapore decisions and two foreign.

[2026] SGDC 215 explained

WENDY DANUBRATA v J+F PRIVATE LIMITED & Anor ([2026] SGDC 215) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 2 July 2026. It is categorised under Contract and Tort. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGDC 215 about?

WENDY DANUBRATA v J+F PRIVATE LIMITED & Anor ([2026] SGDC 215) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Misrepresentation Act”, “Tort — Misrepresentation — Fraud and deceit”, and “Tort — Misrepresentation — Negligent misrepresentation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 215 consider?

The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50) and Misrepresentation Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

What did the agreement between Wendy Danubrata and J+F Private Limited promise ([2026] SGDC 215)?

The 5 May 2022 agreement promised Wendy Danubrata annual dividends of $15,000 starting 4 May 2023, funded by renting out a property at 61 Telok Blangah Heights, plus return of her $100,000 capital together with a fourth dividend on 4 May 2026.