CHAN WAN QI, ANGELA v PRICE ANTHONY THOMAS & Anor
Key facts
| Court | District Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Andrew Tan Shao Weng |
| Charges / claim | Striking out |
| Counsel | NLC Law Asia LLC, Tan Jinwen, Mark |
Source: [2026] SGDC 270, District Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
Chan Wan Qi, Angela v Price Anthony Thomas & Anor [2026] SGDC 270 was decided by Deputy Registrar Andrew Tan Shao Weng in the District Court on 24 August 2026, after hearings on 17 June 2026 and 25 June 2026. Ms Chan, owner of 35 Burnfoot Terrace, let it to Bundleluxe under a tenancy agreement dated 29 December 2023 at a monthly rent of $8,500; rent was unpaid from at least May 2024 and Mr Price and his family moved out only on 18 March 2025. She sued Bundleluxe and Mr Price for breach of contract, trespass and conspiracy. The issue was whether parts of the Statement of Claim should be struck out under Order 9 Rule 16 of the Rules of Court 2021. The court dismissed DC/SUM 532/2026 and awarded costs to Ms Chan.
[2026] SGDC 270 explained
CHAN WAN QI, ANGELA v PRICE ANTHONY THOMAS & Anor ([2026] SGDC 270) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 24 August 2026. It is categorised under Striking out. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGDC 270 about?
CHAN WAN QI, ANGELA v PRICE ANTHONY THOMAS & Anor ([2026] SGDC 270) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Striking out”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGDC 270 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50) and Evidence Act (Cap 97). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
How influential is [2026] SGDC 270?
Within this corpus, [2026] SGDC 270 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
The District Court, through a Deputy Registrar, dismissed a summons by Price Anthony Thomas to strike out parts of a Statement of Claim by Chan Wan Qi, Angela. She sued him and Bundleluxe Pte. Ltd. for breach of contract, trespass and conspiracy after unpaid rent under a tenancy of her property at a monthly rent of $8,500. The court held her pleadings were not plainly unsustainable and ordered both defendants to bear her costs jointly and severally.
What was Chan Wan Qi, Angela v Price Anthony Thomas about ([2026] SGDC 270)?
A landlord sued a tenant company and its director for unpaid rent, trespass and conspiracy after the tenancy expired. The director applied to strike out parts of the claim, and the District Court dismissed that application.
What did the court decide in [2026] SGDC 270?
Deputy Registrar Andrew Tan Shao Weng dismissed Mr Price's striking out summons in its entirety, finding the pleadings not liable to be struck out, and awarded costs to Ms Chan, borne jointly and severally by both defendants.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (12)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 270)