Sunlight Paper Products Pte Ltd v Decorial Pte Ltd
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2026] SGDC 65 is a District Court decision dated 16 February 2026 concerning Contract, specifically addressing remedies. The judgment was delivered by Teo Guan Kee. The case was brought by Sunlight Paper Products Pte. Ltd. (plaintiff) against Decorial Pte. Ltd. (defendant). Legal representation was provided by CSP Legal LLC and Phoenix Law Corporation. The judgment cites 4 cases.
Summary
A tissue products company sued an awning contractor to recover a $36,554 deposit after the contractor failed to deliver a retractable awning system that would comply with a 25-metre height restriction for the building. The court dismissed the deposit recovery claim, finding the claimant had repudiated the contract by wrongfully refusing to allow installation, but awarded only nominal damages of $100 on the contractor's counterclaim for lost profits due to insufficient evidence of costs.
What was decided in [2026] SGDC 65?
[2026] SGDC 65 (Sunlight Paper Products Pte Ltd v Decorial Pte Ltd) is a District Court decision from 16 February 2026 addressing Contract, specifically remedies. The judgment was delivered by Teo Guan Kee.
Who were the parties in Sunlight Paper Products Pte Ltd v Decorial Pte Ltd?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGDC 65 was Sunlight Paper Products Pte. Ltd., and the defendant was Decorial Pte. Ltd.. Legal representation included Phoenix Law Corporation and CSP Legal LLC. The case was decided on 16 February 2026 in the District Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGDC 65?
[2026] SGDC 65 was delivered by Teo Guan Kee in the District Court on 16 February 2026. The case concerned Contract.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGDC 65 cite?
[2026] SGDC 65 cites 4 prior decisions.
Cases Cited (4)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGDC 65)