YAQ v YAR
Key facts
| Court | Family Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Amy Tung |
| Charges / claim | Family Law, International Law |
| Counsel | Harry Elias Partnership LLP, Annette Tan Kean Yoke, Gill Carrie Kaur, Tan Hui Qing |
Source: [2026] SGFC 41, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
[2026] SGFC 41 explained
YAQ v YAR ([2026] SGFC 41) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 20 March 2026. It is categorised under Family Law and International Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGFC 41 about?
YAQ v YAR ([2026] SGFC 41) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Child — Abduction — Section 8 of the International Child Abduction Act 2010” and “International Law — Conventions — Articles 3 and 13(a) of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGFC 41 consider?
The judgment refers to Guardianship of Infants Act (Cap 122) and International Child Abduction Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 41)