WPN v WPO
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kwek Mean Luck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Harry Elias Partnership LLP, Josephine Chong LLC, Chew Wei En, Chong Siew Nyuk Josephine, Gill Carrie Kaur, Kym Calista Anstey |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 38, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WPN v WPO [2023] SGHCF 38 is a grounds of decision of Kwek Mean Luck J in the Family Division of the High Court, delivered on 31 August 2023 in Divorce (Transferred) No 6040 of 2017. The proceedings concerned the ancillary matters between the plaintiff Wife, a housewife for most of the marriage, and the defendant Husband, the CEO of a Singapore-incorporated fintech startup, who married on 1 August 1988 and had been married for over 30 years by the interim judgment date of 28 January 2019. The court valued the pool of matrimonial assets at $31,259,918.62, awarded the Wife 50% of that pool, and ordered the transfer of the Coronation Road property and shares in [B] Pte Ltd to her, with the catchwords addressing division of matrimonial assets and wife maintenance.
[2023] SGHCF 38 explained
WPN v WPO ([2023] SGHCF 38) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 31 August 2023. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 4 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2023] SGHCF 38 about?
WPN v WPO ([2023] SGHCF 38) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Maintenance — Wife” and “Family Law — Matrimonial assets — Division”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2023] SGHCF 38 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2023] SGHCF 9 and [2023] SGHCF 4. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2023] SGHCF 38?
Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 38 has been cited by 4 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Summary
This case concerned the ancillary matters in the divorce of a wife (a homemaker for most of the marriage) and a husband (a fintech company CEO), who married in 1988 and had been wed for over 30 years by the interim judgment date. The court valued the pool of matrimonial assets at $31,259,918.62, awarded the wife 50%, ordered the Coronation Road property transferred to her together with company shares, and directed the husband to pay monthly cash sums. Both parties appealed against parts of the decision, and each was ordered to bear its own costs.
What was WPN v WPO [2023] SGHCF 38 about?
It was an ancillary matters decision by Kwek Mean Luck J in the Family Division of the High Court, dividing the matrimonial assets of a couple married on 1 August 1988, with judgment delivered on 31 August 2023.
How were the matrimonial assets divided in [2023] SGHCF 38?
Kwek Mean Luck J valued the matrimonial asset pool at $31,259,918.62 and awarded the Wife 50%, ordering transfer of the Coronation Road property and shares in [B] Pte Ltd to her in partial satisfaction of her share.
Cases Cited (18)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 38)