WGE v WGF
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Josephine Chong LLC, Chong Siew Nyuk Josephine, Johnson Loo Teck Lee, Kym Calista Anstey, Lew Zi Qi |
Source: [2023] SGHCF 26, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WGE v WGF [2023] SGHCF 26 is a reserved judgment of Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J in the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), delivered on 22 May 2023 in District Court Appeal No 83 of 2022. The appeal, brought by the Wife (WGE) against the Husband (WGF), challenged a decision of the Family Courts on the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance; the parties married on 26 September 2010, have one child D who is seven, and the Wife commenced divorce proceedings on 22 January 2021. The issues included the indirect contributions ratio for the homemaker wife, the valuation of company shares with discounts for lack of marketability and control, and the appropriate multiplicand and multiplier for maintenance.
Summary
The wife appealed against a Family Court decision on the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance following a marriage of about ten years, with issues including her indirect-contribution ratio, the valuation of company shares, and the maintenance multiplicand and multiplier. The court determined a final division ratio and addressed the disputed share-valuation discounts. The wife succeeded on the two issues with the greatest impact on her finances, and the court indicated she should be awarded costs of the appeal adjusted for the points on which she failed.
What did the court consider in WGE v WGF [2023] SGHCF 26?
Mavis Chionh Sze Chyi J heard the Wife's appeal against a Family Courts decision on the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance, addressing the homemaker's indirect contributions ratio, share valuation discounts, and the multiplicand and multiplier for maintenance.
Why did share valuation matter in WGE v WGF [2023] SGHCF 26?
A key issue was whether discounts for lack of marketability and lack of control were warranted under the market approach when valuing shares, and the appropriate value of those discounts, alongside whether homemaking efforts had substantially improved a company's shares.
Cases Cited (43)
Cited By (13)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 26)