XMU v XMV

[2026] SGHCF 8 High Court (Family Division) 20 March 2026 HCF/DCA 23/2025
18 cases cited (16 SG, 2 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Appeal allowed in part

“I allowed the appeal in part and ordered as follows: (a) The pool of matrimonial assets was divided 50.5% in favour of the Husband and 49.5% in favour of the Wife.”

Source: [2026] SGHCF 8, High Court (Family Division), decided 20 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court High Court (Family Division)
Decided
Judge Teh Hwee Hwee
Charges / claim Family Law
Outcome Appeal allowed in part
Counsel T L Yap Law Chambers LLC, UniLegal LLC, Huang Liang Jun Russell, Tan Keng Loon Clarence, Yap Teong Liang

Source: [2026] SGHCF 8, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (5)

T L Yap Law Chambers LLC Firm UniLegal LLC Firm
Huang Liang Jun Russell Counsel for the respondent
Tan Keng Loon Clarence Counsel for the appellant
Yap Teong Liang Counsel for the respondent

Parties (2)

XMU Appellant
XMV Respondent

Case Significance

In XMU v XMV [2026] SGHCF 8, the High Court Family Division on 20 March 2026 determined the weight to be accorded to a pre-nuptial agreement and the consequent division of matrimonial assets following a short marriage. The parties married on 11 February 2018, having signed the pre-nuptial agreement two days before the wedding. The husband, a 39-year-old Singapore citizen and company director, commenced divorce proceedings on 12 April 2022. The wife, a Chinese citizen one year younger and a business owner pursuing a postgraduate degree in Singapore, was the respondent to the divorce. There were no children from the marriage. Teh Hwee Hwee J heard the matter on 4 September 2025, 16 January 2026, and 4 February 2026 before reserving judgment. Tan Keng Loon Clarence of UniLegal LLC appeared for the appellant and Yap Teong Liang and Huang Liang Jun Russell of T L Yap Law Chambers LLC for the respondent.

What was the key family law question in XMU v XMV [2026] SGHCF 8?

Teh Hwee Hwee J had to determine how much weight to give a pre-nuptial agreement signed two days before the 11 February 2018 marriage in dividing matrimonial assets after the husband filed for divorce on 12 April 2022 — a childless marriage of roughly four years between a Singapore and a Chinese national.

When was the pre-nuptial agreement in XMU v XMV [2026] SGHCF 8 signed relative to the marriage?

The pre-nuptial agreement in XMU v XMV was executed two days before the parties' marriage on 11 February 2018. Teh Hwee Hwee J examined the weight of that agreement in the context of matrimonial asset division in a judgment issued on 20 March 2026.

Cases Cited (18)

SG (5)
[2013] SGHC 50 [2019] SGHCF 4 [2022] SGHCF 16 [2023] SGHC(A) 28 [2023] SGHCF 26
SLR (11)
[2007] 2 SLR(R) 729 [2009] 2 SLR(R) 961 [2014] 1 SLR 1342 [2014] 3 SLR 1284 [2015] 4 SLR 1043 [2016] 2 SLR 686 [2016] 4 SLR 145 [2018] 4 SLR 779 [2019] 1 SLR 608 [2020] 2 SLR 588 [2024] 2 SLR 557
UK (1)
[1980] 1 WLR 1410
AU (1)
[2017] HCA 49

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments on the same subject, most closely matched first.

Referenced in

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCF 8)