VPN v VPO
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2026] SGFC 6 is a Family Court decision dated 5 February 2026 concerning Custody, Variation of Access, Variation of Care and Control, and Variation of Maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Goh Zhuo Neng. The case was brought by VPN (plaintiff) against VPO (defendant). The judgment cites 11 cases.
Summary
Both parents of a seven-year-old child filed competing applications to vary a 2020 consent order on custody, care and control, access, and maintenance, marking their fifth round of litigation over these matters. The court made comprehensive orders expanding the father's access while maintaining the mother's care and control, increasing child maintenance to $575 per month, and inserting a penal notice to address ongoing non-compliance.
What was decided in [2026] SGFC 6?
[2026] SGFC 6 (VPN v VPO) is a Family Court decision from 5 February 2026 addressing Custody, Variation of Access, Variation of Care and Control, and Variation of Maintenance. The judgment was delivered by Goh Zhuo Neng.
Who were the parties in VPN v VPO?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGFC 6 was VPN, and the defendant was VPO. The case was decided on 5 February 2026 in the Family Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGFC 6?
[2026] SGFC 6 was delivered by Goh Zhuo Neng in the Family Court on 5 February 2026. The case concerned Custody, Variation of Access, Variation of Care and Control, and Variation of Maintenance.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGFC 6 cite?
[2026] SGFC 6 cites 11 prior decisions.
Cases Cited (11)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 6)