CXR v CXQ

[2023] SGHCF 10 High Court (Family Division) 8 March 2023 HCF/DT 806/2020 56 min read
11 cases cited Cited by 11 cases

Key facts

Court High Court (Family Division)
Decided
Judge Debbie Ong
Charges / claim Family Law
Counsel Alain A Johns Partnership, Alain Abraham Johns

Source: [2023] SGHCF 10, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

CXR v CXQ [2023] SGHCF 10 was decided by the General Division of the High Court (Family Division) (Debbie Ong JAD) on 8 March 2023 in Divorce (Transferred) No 806 of 2020. The plaintiff Wife, a director and head of Marine Insurance earning about $48,635 net per month, and the defendant Husband, unemployed at the ancillary hearing with a gross rental income of $2,938 per month and a last drawn salary of approximately $36,494 as an investment banker, were married on 12 February 2011 for 9 years and 9 months before interim judgment on 30 November 2020. The ancillary matters concerned custody, care and control, access, division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance for their son C, aged 11, who had refractory frontal lobe epilepsy and comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders.

[2023] SGHCF 10 explained

CXR v CXQ ([2023] SGHCF 10) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 8 March 2023. It is categorised under Family Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 11 other reported Singapore judgments, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2023] SGHCF 10 about?

CXR v CXQ ([2023] SGHCF 10) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2023. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Custody — Access”, “Family Law — Maintenance — Child”, “Family Law — Custody — Care and control”, and “Family Law — Matrimonial Assets — Division”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

How influential is [2023] SGHCF 10?

Within this corpus, [2023] SGHCF 10 has been cited by 11 later reported Singapore judgments. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Summary

This divorce case in the High Court (Family Division) concerned ancillary matters between a wife employed as a marine insurance director and an unemployed husband formerly working as an investment banker, following a marriage of about nine years and nine months. The disputed issues included custody, care and control, and access for their child, who had significant medical and neurodevelopmental conditions, as well as division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance. The court ordered a shared care and control arrangement, with each party bearing the child's expenses while in their respective care.

What issues did CXR v CXQ [2023] SGHCF 10 decide?

The ancillary matters covered custody, care and control, access, division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance in a divorce, involving the parties' son C, aged 11, who was diagnosed with refractory frontal lobe epilepsy and four comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders.

What were the parties' incomes in CXR v CXQ [2023] SGHCF 10?

The Wife earned about $48,635 net per month as head of Marine Insurance. The Husband was unemployed at the ancillary hearing, drawing $2,938 gross rental income per month; his last drawn salary as an investment banker was approximately $36,494 for income earned in 2018.

Cases Cited (11)

SG (1)
[2022] SGHCF 7
SLR (10)
[2000] 3 SLR(R) 647 [2002] 1 SLR(R) 76 [2005] 3 SLR 690 [2015] 4 SLR 1043 [2016] 3 SLR 1172 [2017] 1 SLR 609 [2020] 1 SLR 551 [2020] 2 SLR 588 [2020] 3 SLR 683 [2021] 1 SLR 426

Cited By (11)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2023] SGHCF 10)