XNG v XNH
Key facts
| Court | High Court (Family Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck |
| Charges / claim | Family Law |
| Counsel | Godwin Campos LLC, Harry Elias Partnership LLP, Adam Naeha Sitara Binte Adam Rabbani, Charis Sim Wei Li, Godwin Gilbert Campos, Kok Yee Keong, Toh Ming Wai |
Source: [2026] SGHCF 3, High Court (Family Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHCF 3 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 5 February 2026 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing mareva injunction. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by XNG (applicant) against XNH (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Harry Elias Partnership LLP and Godwin Campos LLC. The judgment cites 8 cases (6 Singapore, 2 foreign).
[2026] SGHCF 3 explained
XNG v XNH ([2026] SGHCF 3) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (Family Division) on 5 February 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHCF 3 about?
XNG v XNH ([2026] SGHCF 3) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Mareva injunction — Consent order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHCF 3 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGCA 36 and [2024] SGHC 182. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
A divorced wife sought a domestic Mareva injunction against her ex-husband to preserve assets up to $7.56 million, the outstanding balance under a 2023 consent order requiring him to pay $20 million by June 2027, after he ceased monthly payments and refinanced his bungalow with a substantially larger mortgage. The court granted the injunction and ordered the husband to place funds with his solicitors to cover all remaining monthly payments under the consent order.
What was decided in [2026] SGHCF 3?
[2026] SGHCF 3 (XNG v XNH) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 5 February 2026 addressing Family Law, specifically mareva injunction. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in XNG v XNH ([2026] SGHCF 3)?
The applicant in [2026] SGHCF 3 was XNG, and the respondent was XNH. Legal representation included Harry Elias Partnership LLP and Godwin Campos LLC. The case was decided on 5 February 2026 in the High Court (Family Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHCF 3?
[2026] SGHCF 3 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (Family Division) on 5 February 2026. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHCF 3 cite?
[2026] SGHCF 3 cites 8 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (8)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCF 3)