Kok Yee Keong
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Kok Yee Keong. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Kok Yee Keong appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court (Family Division).
These cases span several subject areas, most often Family Law, and Kok Yee Keong acted for the applicant in 2 and the plaintiff in 2.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court (Family Division), High Court, High Court Registrar
- Period
- October 2023 to February 2026
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Kok Yee Keong — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Kok Yee Keong appeared
- Counsel for the applicant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the non-party
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I therefore dismiss the claim with costs to Joyce.”
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim dismissed
What areas of law does Kok Yee Keong practice?
Family Law 2 cases
Reported in February 2026.
Counsel for the applicant (2)
-
The court allowed the wife's costs claim in part.
High Court (Family Division) · 13 February 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 4 -
The court allowed the application and ordered that the defendant be restrained from disposing of, dealing with or diminishing his assets up to S$7,564,092.50, and that within 30 days he place funds…
High Court (Family Division) · 5 February 2026 · [2026] SGHCF 3
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
Assistant Registrar Leo Zhi Wei struck out the claim in part.
High Court Registrar · 2 May 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 12 -
The High Court dismissed the claim with costs to Joyce, finding that the parties intended an equal and unconditional split of the joint account assets and that the Trust Portion belonged to Joyce;…
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288
Counsel for the non-party (1)
-
The High Court extended the moratoria over the companies for three months and refused the landlords' carve-outs, but ordered that in OA 373 and OA 375 each landlord may exercise re-entry or…
High Court · 18 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 156