Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng

[2026] SGMC 93 Magistrate Court 5 August 2026 SC-900958-2025 48 min read
9 cases cited

Key facts

Court Magistrate Court
Decided
Judge Justin Yeo
Charges / claim Criminal Procedure and Sentencing
Counsel Cross Street Chambers, National Parks Board, Fadhlina Idris, Paul

Source: [2026] SGMC 93, Magistrate Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Cross Street Chambers Firm
National Parks Board Firm
Fadhlina Idris Counsel for the plaintiff
Paul Counsel for the defendant

Parties (2)

Public Prosecutor Plaintiff
Ng Siew Teng Defendant

Case Significance

Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng [2026] SGMC 93 is a Magistrate's Court decision of District Judge Justin Yeo, delivered on 5 August 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to five charges under the Animal and Birds Act 1965: three charges of abetting the importation of puppies without a licence, one charge of abetting unnecessary suffering while a puppy was transported, and one charge of keeping 21 puppies in captivity for sale at an unlicensed residence. Eight charges were taken into consideration. She and her husband used a courier to smuggle puppies from Malaysia, and the 21 puppies were sold for a profit of $21,000. The court imposed ten, eight and eight weeks' imprisonment for the importation charges, nine weeks' for unnecessary suffering, and three days' imprisonment with a $5,000 fine for unlicensed captivity, giving an aggregate of 19 weeks' and three days' imprisonment.

[2026] SGMC 93 explained

Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng ([2026] SGMC 93) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Magistrate Court on 5 August 2026. It is categorised under Criminal Procedure and Sentencing. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGMC 93 about?

Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng ([2026] SGMC 93) is a Magistrate Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Sentencing – Statutory Offences – Section 8(1) Animal and Birds Act 1965 Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Sentencing – Statutory Offences – Section 41C(1)(a)(iii) Animal and Birds Act 1965 Criminal Procedure and Sentencing – Sentencing – Statutory Offences – Section 48(1) Animal and Birds Act 1965”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGMC 93 consider?

The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

Summary

The Magistrate's Court sentenced Ng Siew Teng, who pleaded guilty to five charges under the Animal and Birds Act 1965 arising from a scheme with her husband to illegally import puppies from Malaysia for sale in Singapore. The charges covered three importation offences, causing unnecessary suffering to a puppy during transport, and keeping 21 puppies in unlicensed captivity. Eight further charges were taken into consideration. The court imposed an aggregate sentence of 19 weeks' and three days' imprisonment and a fine of $5,000.

What sentence did Ng Siew Teng receive in [2026] SGMC 93?

She received an aggregate sentence of 19 weeks' and three days' imprisonment and a fine of $5,000 (in default, two weeks' imprisonment), after the terms for the E1 importation, unnecessary suffering and unlicensed captivity charges were ordered to run consecutively.

What was Public Prosecutor v Ng Siew Teng about ([2026] SGMC 93)?

It concerned offences under the Animal and Birds Act 1965 in which the accused and her husband illegally imported puppies from Malaysia through a courier, caused suffering to a puppy in transport, and kept 21 puppies in unlicensed captivity for sale.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (9)

SG (4)
[2023] SGDC 175 [2023] SGMC 23 [2024] SGDC 76 [2026] SGMC 8
SLR (5)
[1993] 2 SLR(R) 406 [2001] 3 SLR(R) 134 [2014] 2 SLR 998 [2018] 4 SLR 799 [2022] 5 SLR 1075

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGMC 93)