Leading Deeds and Other Instruments Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
3 reported cases · October 2023 to September 2024
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Deeds and Other Instruments?
Singapore courts issued 3 reported Deeds and Other Instruments judgments between 2023–2024, most in SGHC (2), of the 2 with a parseable operative disposition, the most common was Appeal dismissed (1). This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 3 reported Deeds and Other Instruments judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 3 reported Deeds and Other Instruments judgments in Singapore courts (October 2023 to September 2024), Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is the most active firm by reported case count (1 cases), Poon Kin Mun Kelvin is the most active lawyer (1 case appearances). This ranks named firms and lawyers by how often they appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Deeds and Other Instruments appears in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2024). The most common sub-topics are Deeds — Interpretation — Whether the trust deed prohibits certain unitholders of the trust from voting at an extraordinary general meeting (1), Deeds — Interpretation — Whether reference to the vessel’s “appurtenances” includes “gaming equipment” on board — Whether reference to the vessel’s “belongings” includes “gaming equipment” on board (1) and Deeds — Execution — Formalities (1). The most active judge by reported case count is Kannan Ramesh (1 case) and the most active firm is Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (1 case).
Which law firms handle the most Deeds and Other Instruments cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP leads in Deeds and Other Instruments with 1 cases between October 2023 and September 2024, followed by WongPartnership LLP (1 cases) and Providence Law Asia LLC (1 cases). 8 firms appeared in Deeds and Other Instruments cases during this period.
Who are the leading Deeds and Other Instruments lawyers in Singapore?
Poon Kin Mun Kelvin is the most active Deeds and Other Instruments lawyer in Singapore with 1 case appearances between October 2023 and September 2024, followed by Jaikanth Shankar (1) and Zhuo Jiaxiang (1).
Which judges handle the most Deeds and Other Instruments cases in Singapore?
Kannan Ramesh has handled 1 Deeds and Other Instruments cases between October 2023 and September 2024, the most of any Singapore judge. See Kee Oon (1 cases) and Debbie Ong Siew Ling (1 cases) are also among the most active.
How many Deeds and Other Instruments cases are reported in Singapore courts?
3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2024) involve Deeds and Other Instruments, most often decided by Kannan Ramesh.
What are the main sub-topics in Singapore Deeds and Other Instruments cases?
The main sub-topics are Deeds — Interpretation — Whether the trust deed prohibits certain unitholders of the trust from voting at an extraordinary general meeting (1), Deeds — Interpretation — Whether reference to the vessel’s “appurtenances” includes “gaming equipment” on board — Whether reference to the vessel’s “belongings” includes “gaming equipment” on board (1) and Deeds — Execution — Formalities (1).
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Deeds — Interpretation — Whether the trust deed prohibits certain unitholders of the trust from voting at an extraordinary general meeting 1 case
Deeds — Interpretation — Whether reference to the vessel’s “appurtenances” includes “gaming equipment” on board — Whether reference to the vessel’s “belongings” includes “gaming equipment” on board 1 case
Deeds — Execution — Formalities 1 case
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Supreme Court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.