Lukshumayeh Law Corporation
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lukshumayeh Law Corporation. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Lukshumayeh Law Corporation appears in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Criminal Law, and Lukshumayeh Law Corporation acted for the respondent in 1 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- April 2023 to January 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Lukshumayeh Law Corporation — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Lukshumayeh Law Corporation appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the accused
- 1 case
- Counsel for the second accused
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I accordingly dismissed the appeal with costs.”
High Court · 29 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 20 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Lukshumayeh Law Corporation specialize in?
Counsel named in these judgments (2)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Lukshumayeh Law Corporation in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (4)
-
The court allowed the Law Society's application and ordered that Mr K V Sudeep Kumar be suspended from practice for five years, starting from his discharge from bankruptcy, and that Mr Dhanwant Singh…
High Court · 13 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 9 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal with costs and affirmed summary judgment for $429,775.72 against the buyer, with no stay of execution.
High Court · 29 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 20 -
The court convicted Mr Tan of possessing not less than 37.95g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and convicted Mr Dineshkumar of trafficking the drugs to Mr Tan.
High Court · 25 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 235 -
The court found the elements of the trafficking charge established against both Low and Sivaprakash and convicted them.
High Court · 14 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 95