Debt and Recovery

4 cases · July 2025 to October 2025

Overview

Debt and Recovery appeared in 4 reported judgments in Singapore between July 2025 to October 2025. Key sub-topics included Right of set-off (2) and right of set-off — contractual (1). The most active judge was Mohamed Faizal (2 cases), and the leading firm was Oon & Bazul LLP (1 case).

Data coverage: between July 2025 to October 2025

Which law firms handle the most Debt and Recovery cases in Singapore?

Oon & Bazul LLP leads in debt and recovery with 1 case between July 2025 to October 2025, followed by Mallal & Namazie (1 case) and WongPartnership LLP (1 case). 6 firms appeared in debt and recovery cases during this period.

Who are the leading Debt and Recovery lawyers in Singapore?

Toh Yong Xiang is the most active debt and recovery lawyer in Singapore with 1 case appearance between July 2025 to October 2025, followed by Ryan Mark Lopez (1) and Chan Ming Onn David (1). 22 lawyers appeared in debt and recovery cases during this period.

Which judges handle the most Debt and Recovery cases in Singapore?

Mohamed Faizal has handled 2 cases in debt and recovery between July 2025 to October 2025, the most of any Singapore judge. Teo Guan Kee (1 case) and Chiah Kok Khun (1 case) are also among the most active. 3 judges heard debt and recovery cases.

How many debt and recovery cases are heard in Singapore courts?

Between July 2025 to October 2025, 4 reported judgments involved debt and recovery in Singapore courts. The majority were heard in the High Court (General Division) (2 cases).

What are the main sub-topics in Singapore debt and recovery cases?

The main sub-topics in Singapore debt and recovery litigation between July 2025 to October 2025 were Right of set-off (2 cases), right of set-off — contractual (1 case), Enforcement — Writs of seizure and sale — Whether judgment creditor had taken reasonable steps to ascertain ownership of moveable property seized — Whether judgment creditor owed third party a duty of care to verify ownership of moveable property before executing writ of seizure and sale (1 case).

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Enforcement — Writs of seizure and sale — Whether judgment creditor had taken reasonable steps to ascertain ownership of moveable property seized — Whether judgment creditor owed third party a duty of care to verify ownership of moveable property before executing writ of seizure and sale 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 2 cases
cited in 2 cases
Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 2 cases
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act
cited in 2 cases
cited in 1 case
Law of Property Act
cited in 1 case
Insolvency Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Cases