Lumen Law Corporation
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lumen Law Corporation. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Lumen Law Corporation appears in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Tort, Building and Construction Law and Contract, and Lumen Law Corporation acted for the defendant in 2 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court, Magistrate Court
- Period
- June 2023 to January 2026
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Lumen Law Corporation — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Lumen Law Corporation appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim dismissed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I therefore dismiss the claim against both Defendants as the Claimant has failed to prove that they were responsible for publishing the Statements.”
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 · Counsel for the defendant · Claim dismissed -
“The appeal is dismissed in whole, and the DJ’s decision is affirmed.”
High Court · 4 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 279 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Lumen Law Corporation specialize in?
Counsel named in these judgments (1)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Lumen Law Corporation in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (3)
-
The District Judge dismissed the claim against both defendants because the claimant had not proved that either of them was responsible for publishing the statements.
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 -
The High Court dismissed the appeal in whole and affirmed the District Judge's decision, leaving costs to be heard later if the parties could not agree.
High Court · 4 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 279 -
Teh Hwee Hwee JC allowed AGPL's application and set aside the adjudication determination under s 27(8)(a) of the SOPA, because the adjudication application was lodged prematurely and the adjudicator…
High Court · 22 June 2023 · [2023] SGHC 175