Chia Swee Chye Kelvin
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Chia Swee Chye Kelvin. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Chia Swee Chye Kelvin appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Tort, Building and Construction Law and Contract, and Chia Swee Chye Kelvin acted for the defendant in 2 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court, Magistrate Court
- Period
- June 2023 to January 2026
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Chia Swee Chye Kelvin — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Chia Swee Chye Kelvin appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim dismissed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I therefore dismiss the claim against both Defendants as the Claimant has failed to prove that they were responsible for publishing the Statements.”
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 · Counsel for the defendant · Claim dismissed -
“The appeal is dismissed in whole, and the DJ’s decision is affirmed.”
High Court · 4 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 279 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Chia Swee Chye Kelvin practice?
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
The District Judge dismissed the claim against both defendants because the claimant had not proved that either of them was responsible for publishing the statements.
Magistrate Court · 27 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 1 -
Teh Hwee Hwee JC allowed AGPL's application and set aside the adjudication determination under s 27(8)(a) of the SOPA, because the adjudication application was lodged prematurely and the adjudicator…
High Court · 22 June 2023 · [2023] SGHC 175
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal in whole and affirmed the District Judge's decision, leaving costs to be heard later if the parties could not agree.
High Court · 4 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 279