Don Ho
AR Don Ho has 7 reported Singapore decisions (2026) in the District Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure and Legal Profession.
- Reported decisions
- 7
- Courts
- District Court, Magistrate Court
- Period
- January 2026 to September 2026
Source: derived from 7 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Don Ho in the reported-judgment record
How Don Ho appeared
- Delivered the judgment
- 7 cases
Recorded outcomes
- Application allowed
- 1
- Claim allowed in part
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 7 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“For the foregoing reasons, I allowed the application in SUM 552 and authorised Mr Sum to represent Despace, without requiring an undertaking from Mr Sum to be personally responsible for the payment of legal costs should it be ordered against Despace in OC 1516.”
District Court · 4 May 2026 · [2026] SGDC 155 · Delivered the judgment · Application allowed -
“For the foregoing reasons, I award general damages in the global sum of $9,800 and special damages in the global sum of $3353.71 with the usual consequential orders.”
Magistrate Court · 5 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 3 · Delivered the judgment · Claim allowed in part
Parties in these cases
Which areas of law do Don Ho’s reported decisions cover?
Civil Procedure 4 cases
Reported between January 2026 and May 2026.
Legal Profession 3 cases
Reported between January 2026 and May 2026.
Cases Delivered (7)
-
The Magistrate's Court sentenced Mr Lau to a fine of $4,000.
Magistrate Court · 29 September 2026 · [2026] SGMC 113 -
The Deputy Registrar allowed the application in part.
District Court · 9 September 2026 · [2026] SGDC 295 -
The District Court held that it had jurisdiction to hear and determine the application.
District Court · 12 May 2026 · [2026] SGDC 162 -
The Deputy Registrar allowed the application in SUM 552, giving Mr Sum permission to act for Despace, and did so without requiring any undertaking from him to be personally responsible for costs…
District Court · 4 May 2026 · [2026] SGDC 155 -
The court ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiff costs fixed at $3,000 (all-in) on the standard basis for work up to the offer, and the plaintiff to pay the defendants $24,000 (all-in) on the…
Magistrate Court · 24 April 2026 · [2026] SGMC 52 -
The court held that a request for approval must identify the grounds of the intended application, and that naming only the type of application is not enough.
District Court · 18 March 2026 · [2026] SGDC 100 -
Deputy Registrar Don Ho allowed the claim in part, awarding general damages of $9,800 and special damages of $3353.71 with the usual consequential orders.
Magistrate Court · 5 January 2026 · [2026] SGMC 3